My impression is that they'resaying the criminal charges were brought under the wrong law. A law against rape would have (presumably) permitted a guilty verdict. But the law against anal sodomy they struck down because it didn't allow for consent.
"Aiming to ban consensual sex is flat out wrong," says its executive director. "A person's sexual orientation shouldn't matter."
That's a bad argument right there. It would allow for pedophilia, since the pedophilia law doesn't allow for the consent of the child.
Now that the gay mafia has gotten widespread recognition for their sham marriages, their next stop is seeking out florists, bakers and other wedding service providers for destruction unless they agree to celebrate their farce.
After that, they are divided on who they should go after next-- the laws against pedophilia or religious organizations who refuse to perform their farcical marriages.