Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoughtyOne; sickoflibs; Impy; NFHale

Anything less than my proposal leaves the sub-animals an opening to cause mayhem.

They are a disease that needs to be eradicated, period.

That’s why I wrote in my first post “The America that we knew” or thereabouts. Back then even a RAT like Truman knew what needed to be done against a fanatical foe and did it.

Intestinal fortitude is rapidly disappearing in this country and with it goes the country, or at least what I’d call “America”. Whatever’s left isn’t going to be worth a bucket of piss.


39 posted on 06/19/2014 4:53:05 AM PDT by GOPsterinMA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: GOPsterinMA

Your proposal would accomplish a number of things.

1. You would kill all the enemy in that one city.

That’s the good part.

Here’s the bad part.

1. You would also kill the 90% plus of the population that wasn’t evil incarnate
2. You would only anger the rest of the population across the Middle-East
3. You would not intimidate them
4. There would be no surrender like Japan
5. The international community would trash the United States, even our friends would
6. The United States would be seen as a pariah as bad as the terrorists
7. Any future nuke set of on U. S. grounds would be seen as merely pay-back, not the crime that it was
8. Other nations would be free to use nukes if they felt like it

There’s no way I’m going to agree with you on this.

This is not a situation that could reap results like it did in Japan. It would only make things worse, like a thousand times worse.


53 posted on 06/19/2014 7:37:39 AM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson