Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

From the article:

.....

After almost a year of doing this, eventually I had to admit that the evidence (scientific, historical, etc.) did not agree with my atheism. Instead, the biblical account of history was true. I didn’t like this, though. If the Bible were true, then I was a sinner who deserved judgment. But I had to admit that this is where the evidence led.

After struggling with this for a while, I finally realized that yes, I am a sinner. And God knows my sin better than I do. But He also loves me enough to have sent His Son to pay for it in my place. I realized that, truly, the gospel is Good News. What better news could there be? At that point, I accepted the Lord and became a Christian.

There are many people who believe in creation because they are Christians. I am one for whom the opposite sequence is true—I became a creationist first, and a Christian afterward.

* Mr. Psarris has a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from the University of Massachusetts, and was formerly an engineer in the United States military space program. For more information, visit his website at

creationastronomy.com

Cite this article: No Author. 2014. Creation Conversion: The Turning Point. Acts & Facts. 43 (6).

1 posted on 06/19/2014 8:22:05 AM PDT by fishtank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: fishtank

ICR article image.

2 posted on 06/19/2014 8:22:33 AM PDT by fishtank (The denial of original sin is the root of liberalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fishtank

Spake Psarris website

http://creationastronomy.com/


3 posted on 06/19/2014 8:23:08 AM PDT by fishtank (The denial of original sin is the root of liberalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fishtank

http://creationastronomy.com/controversy/


4 posted on 06/19/2014 8:24:10 AM PDT by fishtank (The denial of original sin is the root of liberalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fishtank

The accidental orbital capture of objects is rubbish or we would have thousands of captured asteroids in orbit around the earth. As it is, satellites need periodic adjustments to stay in orbit.


5 posted on 06/19/2014 8:29:36 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Haven't you lost enough freedoms? Support an end to the WOD now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fishtank
Moon rocks tell us that the Moon is 4.5 billion years old.

Go figure!

6 posted on 06/19/2014 8:33:07 AM PDT by OldNavyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fishtank

Thanks, fishtank.


11 posted on 06/19/2014 9:11:08 AM PDT by afsnco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reed13

bfl


13 posted on 06/19/2014 9:14:53 AM PDT by reed13k (For evil to triumph it is only necessary for good men to do nothings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fishtank

The first real change in my opinions bout old earth and young earth creationism came about when granite and polonium halos were discussed. One of the funniest arguments against polonium halos ended with “this hypothesis cannot accommodate the many alternative lines of evidence that demonstrate a great age for the Earth.” If one fact shows up the theory, maybe those other lines of evidence need to be reviewed.

The kicker for evolution was the fact that once a new species (change in chromosome number) occurred, who the heck did it mate with. Hopeful monsters aside, the mathematics alone make it impossible.


14 posted on 06/19/2014 9:26:13 AM PDT by wbarmy (I chose to be a sheepdog once I saw what happens to the sheep.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson