Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kevkrom

I was given a stop watch as a gift about 40 years ago. The nly time I can remember using it was to track the amount of time the ball was in play during a televised football game. It was the NY Giants against somebody. This was probably sometime in the mid to late 60s.

I wish I still had the notepad because I was pretty meticulous about it. I noted all the plays. Yeesh. My attention span today wouldn’t let me get past the first quarter.

The Giants in those days had a pretty decent running game so dropped passes didn’t stop the clock much when they had the ball.

Anyway, the ball was in play for less than 15 minutes that day. Figure that for each team the offense was on the field for seven and a half minutes and the defense for the rest.

You can see that it takes a lot of television engineering to make 15 minutes of action spread over a 3.5 hour timespan to seem exciting. Yet, millions of viewers are glued to the set drinking it in week after week and missing it when the season’s over. I marvel at the mass hypnosis that TV and good marketing has accomplished.

If you watch televised football for its TV production instead of for its sport value, you can a lot about sedating a population into submission.


82 posted on 06/20/2014 10:36:09 AM PDT by BlueYonder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]


To: BlueYonder

I wasn’t really trying to knock football or baseball. It was just a way to illustrate that you can make any sport seem boring, depending on how you describe the way it’s played.


83 posted on 06/20/2014 10:38:08 AM PDT by kevkrom (I'm not an unreasonable man... well, actually, I am. But hear me out anyway.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]

To: BlueYonder
You just gave me a seed of a thought: the reason the NFL (and its broadcasters) are so successful is that every one of those 15 minutes (if that's the number) is "exciting."

Meanwhile, if you broadcast 90+ minutes of soccer in a continuous fashion, it's "boring" (despite the 15 or so minutes of "excitement").

84 posted on 06/20/2014 10:41:14 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]

To: BlueYonder

The 15 minutes thing on football is misunderstanding the game. Snap to whistle isn’t the whole game, the play really starts when both teams finish their substitutions, that’s when they ( and the commentators, and audience) start trying to figure out what the other team is doing, that’s when audibles start, adjustments happen. Yeah the PLAY is 4 to 8 seconds, but the ACTION is closer to 30.

Also football is structured exactly the same as classic TV dramas. For decades TV drama followed the rule of 3: tell the audience what you’re going to show them, show them, tell them what the just saw. That’s exactly how things work for football, the players come out, the commentators start guessing what will happen, the play happens, the commentators analyze and replay. Lather, rinse, repeat. It’s no coincidence that the NFL’s rise coincides with the rise of TV, it truly is the perfect TV sport. It is The Rockford Files with pads.


86 posted on 06/20/2014 10:49:14 AM PDT by discostu (Ladies and gentlemen watch Ruth!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson