Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

George F. Will: Stopping a lawless president
Washington Post ^ | June 20, 2014 | George Will

Posted on 06/21/2014 6:13:59 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-144 last
To: Jimmy Valentine's brother
The only people who win in court are the lawyers; everyone else loses.

Yes, that's the bottom line. Also it's the main problem with this lawyer-laden admin. If words were cards, they've built a tower of cards by now. Someone please yank one out of the bottom row.

141 posted on 06/22/2014 12:53:22 PM PDT by Albion Wilde ("The commenters are plenty but the thinkers are few." -- Walid Shoebat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion
Can Supreme Court justices be impeached, or is the only check on them the appointment process?

All federal judges can be impeached. One or two Supreme Court justices have been impeached, but none were ever convicted. Several lower court justices have been impeached and convicted.

Can a SCOTUS justice be arrested for criminal acts?

Yes.

142 posted on 06/22/2014 3:54:02 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

Actually, only one SCOTUS justice has ever been impeached— Samuel Chase, in 1801, and he was acquitted.


143 posted on 06/22/2014 3:59:52 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
interesting read.

I especially like this oh-so-true section:

...Obama has suspended, waived and rewritten laws, including the Affordable Care Act. It required the employer mandate to begin this year. But Obama wrote a new law, giving to companies of a certain size a delay until 2016 and stipulating that other employers must certify they will not drop employees to avoid the mandate. Doing so would trigger criminal perjury charges; so he created a new crime, that of adopting a business practice he opposes.

144 posted on 06/25/2014 12:58:09 PM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-144 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson