I noticed that the left only needs a story to justify their allegiance to either Clinton. This was a story.
That will do.
It’s sad, but it’s the truth. When Clinton was in all that trouble, I noticed he could say 4+4=11 and his followers would trash anyone who didn’t accept it as the gospel.
That will suffice here IMO.
I hope all this happy talk about low book sales translates into low support, but I’m not buying it.
You make a good point. Take Obama. Nothing he says has to make sense or have any basis in fact or reality. If the MSM/Dems can repeat his talking points as justification for anything he wants to do, they will do so.
Many MSMers feel that way about Hillary. They are willing to accept any Benghazi tale/justification so long as it lets her off the hook. They just want her to run & win, & be the POTUS they had hoped Obama would be. So indeed they will embrace any explanation that fits the bill.
Otoh, Hillary looks old & tired, & at times unwell. She was a horrible campaigner in ‘08, & her book tour has been a disaster. If she keeps talking, she’s going to rival Biden for gaffes. Plus face it, she is just not that likeable. Her favorable ratings have been dropping ever since she stepper out into the spotlight. All people have to do is see her & they like her less.
I don’t think she’ll be the ‘16 Dem nominee. Too much can happen between now & then. The Dems will be in ruthless mode, trying to retain the WH. Unless Hillary looks invincible, they’ll look for a strong alternative. By ‘16, it’s likely one will have emerged. ‘08 was Hillary’s time, & she missed it. She is not going to be POTUS. That is my prediction, & has been for a while. I’m sticking to it.