[A Navy Vet]

"The justices said that the Environmental Protection Agency lacks authority in some cases to force companies to evaluate ways to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. This rule applies when a company needs a permit to expand facilities or build new ones that would increase overall pollution."

Is this not a good ruling by putting restrictions on the EPA? What am I missing, beside the ruling not including all companies?

[alstewartfan]

It seems to me that the EPA has lost very little of its power to strangle Americans’ freedom. The entire idea that CO2 is a pollutant is erroneous and fraudulent. Yet, this absurd theory stands. Bob