Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GeronL

The “Septic tank” was a memorial, with headstone and marker. All the deaths were properly registered; that’s were the “800” number comes from; there were apparently far, far fewer buried in the mass memorial. Laissez-faire is insinuating that because the story doesn’t SAY there were burial records, we might as well guess that there weren’t.


21 posted on 06/23/2014 2:01:57 PM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: dangus

I get you, thanks.


23 posted on 06/23/2014 2:04:53 PM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: dangus

Straw Man argument.

You shift away fom the nuns not providing burial records to saying that “because the story doiesn’t say there were burial records, we might as well guess that there weren’t.”

The Bon Secours nuns (the ones who ran the place) provided death records to the Tuam registry office, but no proof has been given by the Bon Secours sisters as to burial records. None. Deal with that. Corless said that the nuns did not have the burial records.

Even Archbishop Neury siad that there is no proof of burial location for the 796 children.

How hard is it to right down where A.) each child is specifically buried (burial record) and then B.) go to the Tuam registry office and provide the death record specifically for each.

The nuns did B, but what about A? You know the answer...

What is wrong with asking for specifics on A?


40 posted on 06/24/2014 4:11:16 PM PDT by Laissez-faire capitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson