McConnell is a self-avowed enemy of conservatives and he wil be the GOP leader if re-elected,
So it would be better for him to lose.
McConnell is a self-avowed enemy of conservatives and he wil be the GOP leader if re-elected,
So it would be better for him to lose.
Disagree. Only because it could help defend against Obama’s executive orders. Without control of the senate, there is absolutely no controls on what Hussein Obama will do the last two years.
Well, if you want to believe that, that’s fine...but he never said explicitly said that - he said they were going to “crush” challengers to incumbent Senators.
You remove McConnell and any slim majority, if we get a majority with the Dems picking up the Kentucky seat, it a majority even more dependent on keeping Senators like McCain and Graham on board. We’ve never liked the caucus leader so what’s the difference if McConnell is replaced if Senators like McCain and Graham can continue to hold the rest of it hostage. That’s why we never like the caucus leaders...who would you prefer? Collins?
McConnell is gone in 6 years with no dynasty. Grimes is part of and older Democrat establishment (Lundergans) that predates McConnell that we are on the verge of wiping out here if this election goes well finally...however, if she wins, we’ll probably have work another few decades to remove it from the Commonwealth and would then start expanding beyond onto the national scene. McConnell - an issue for 6 years and then his tenure sunsets, or Grimes a problem for possibly decades.