The important point Gowdy was making is that if evidence is under subpoena, and it gets destroyed, then a jury can infer that the evidence would have been detrimental to the person who destroyed it, and use that inference in deciding the case. Not only is it a bad idea, it can be a separate CRIMINAL charge. It looks like it took Koskinen a while to understand Gowdy’s explanation.
this is the tipping point.
At the very least there had better be a special prosecutor appointed to this case, or I don’t think the USA can survive. If they get away with this, there is no end in sight in abuse of power. It will continue, get larger, more abusive....