Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Republicans Won't Pass Immigration Reform
Townhall.com ^ | June 24, 2014 | Debra J. Saunders

Posted on 06/24/2014 3:58:19 PM PDT by Kaslin

The New York Times reports that House Majority Whip Kevin McCarthy is considered "the best hope" to win passage of a comprehensive immigration reform bill in Congress after he becomes majority leader in July. It's sort of quaint how the Gray Lady wants to believe in miracles.

If a comprehensive bill -- such as the Senate bill that set a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants -- had a chance of passing, then it was in 2009 and 2010, when Democrats controlled the White House, Senate and House of Representatives. President Barack Obama had promised a bill in his first year in office. If Democrats wouldn't deliver when they owned Washington, Republicans have little reason to do their heavy lifting.

The timing for advocates could not be worse -- and not just because the current House majority leader, Eric Cantor of Virginia, lost his primary election bid after his GOP opponent hit him for supporting a comprehensive immigration bill.

This year, thousands of unaccompanied minors and mothers with young children have crossed the U.S.-Mexico border with the expectation that they will be allowed to stay. Some blame Obama's policy to not deport undocumented immigrants who came here illegally when they were children. The White House blames a "misinformation" campaign by opportunistic human smugglers. Either way, the situation is so dire that Democrats are calling the new influx a "humanitarian crisis" that requires a quick and dramatic response.

Rep. Henry Cuellar, D-Texas, told the Houston Chronicle last week that he believes that the administration has to allow more deportations -- and quickly. Also, Hillary Clinton told CNN last week, "They should be sent back." That's how ugly the border is.

McCarthy is a true son of Bakersfield, California. Rather than become a creature of Washington, he sleeps in his Capitol Hill office and flies home every weekend. He hears from the Republican base, which opposes amnesty. He was true to that base in 2008, when he was chairman for the Republican National Committee platform, which threatened financial penalties for sanctuary cities.

McCarthy also hears from employers who depend on immigrant labor and California Republicans eager to court Latino voters. Last year, he met with the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights of Los Angeles after these advocates occupied his Bakersfield office.

On "Fox News Sunday," Chris Wallace pressed McCarthy on whether he'll support a comprehensive immigration reform bill. McCarthy is on record for supporting a path to legalization, but he told Wallace: "I don't believe there should be citizenship. I believe in the rule of law." At the moment, he added, the border is not secure because the government is not enforcing the law.

The forces of idealism are experiencing the blunt trauma of reality. The promise of a path to legalization, coupled with lax law enforcement, has produced unintended, if inevitable, consequences. If there was any doubt that changing the law might result in waves of more illegal immigration, the answer should be clear.

Quoth McCarthy: Until the border is secure, "you can't have an immigration debate."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: aliens
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: BobL
McCarthy can bring up Amnesty for a vote now, if he REALLY WANTS TO, but he will not only lose that vote - he will also, FOR CERTAIN, lose his leadership position in November.

Obama can then appoint him Undersecretary of Undocumented Underwear:

http://houston.cbslocal.com/2014/06/24/homeland-security-seeks-thousands-of-pairs-of-underwear-for-detained-immigrants/>

21 posted on 06/24/2014 5:41:42 PM PDT by kevao (Biblical Jesus: Give your money to the poor. Socialist Jesus: Give your neighbor's money to the poor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Where's the Fence?
22 posted on 06/24/2014 6:30:26 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fightin Whitey

I can only describe the reality I have known over the pass 7 years as part of a grassroots organization that lobbies on the HIll on immigration. Legal immigration is far more dangerous than illegal immigration. The status quo will make the Dems the permanent majority party. Amnesty just hastens the process.


23 posted on 06/24/2014 6:35:32 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: kabar

Then none of it matters, at least as far as our hopes, values, principles and lives are concerned.

None of this electioneering matters, I mean.

So really we’re just kibbitzing here, right? Making friendships, arguing a bit, exchanging information?

And best-case scenario we speak intelligently about our own lives and circumstances in the relative short term...but long term, as far as the country is concerned, all is lost, correct?


24 posted on 06/24/2014 6:49:09 PM PDT by Fightin Whitey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Fightin Whitey
We have entered the era of tribal politics. Demography is destiny. We bring in 1.1 million permanent legal immigrants every year and have been doing so for 25 years. 87% of the legal immigrants are minorities are minorities as defined by the USG. Immigrants and minorities vote more than two to one Dem. Demography is destiny. Unless we reduce legal immigration, we are finished as a party and a nation.


25 posted on 06/24/2014 7:32:45 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Fightin Whitey
you have too much common sense to ever be a politician
26 posted on 06/24/2014 7:54:21 PM PDT by kvanbrunt2 (civil law: commanding what is right and prohibiting what is wrong Blackstone Commentaries I p44)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: kabar

and track detain and export tuberculosis carriers.


27 posted on 06/24/2014 7:59:21 PM PDT by kvanbrunt2 (civil law: commanding what is right and prohibiting what is wrong Blackstone Commentaries I p44)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: libertylover

“If Republicans pass amnesty I’ll drop them as my registered party.”

After what the GOPe just pulled in Mississippi, I’m considering doing it now.

Tell me how the GOPe is any different than the RATs when it comes to dirty politics?


28 posted on 06/24/2014 8:15:10 PM PDT by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: vette6387

They are not. I am a conservative that believes in the true foundation of this nation. If that makes me extreme, so be it.

The GOPe can never expect my support again.


29 posted on 06/24/2014 8:17:57 PM PDT by eyedigress ((zOld storm chaser from the west)/?s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: kabar

Whats the difference between “White Alone” and “non-Hispanic White Alone” ?


30 posted on 06/24/2014 9:05:23 PM PDT by 11th_VA (Decriminalize Tax Evasion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: 11th_VA
Ask George Zimmerman. According to the Census Bureau, Hispanics can be of any race. About half of Hispanics self-describe themselves as white. They are Hispanic-whites.

Hispanic is an arbitrary classification that allows whites to receive affirmative action and minority business set asides.

For example, the Virginia Department of Minority Business defines a minority individual as “an individual who is a citizen of the United States or a non-citizen who is in full compliance with United States immigration law and who satisfies one or more of the following definitions:”

1. “African American” means a person having origins in any of the original peoples of Africa and who is regarded as such by the community of which this person claims to be a part.

2. Asian American” means a person having origins in any of the original peoples of the Far East, Southeast Asia, the Indian subcontinent, or the Pacific Islands, including but not limited to Japan, China, Vietnam, Samoa, Laos, Cambodia, Taiwan, Northern Mariana, the Philippines, a U.S. territory of the Pacific, India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, or Sri Lanka and who is regarded as such by the community of which this person claims to be a part.

3. “Hispanic American” means a person having origins in any of the Spanish-speaking peoples of Mexico, South or Central America, or the Caribbean Islands or other Spanish or Portuguese cultures and who is regarded as such by the community of which this person claims to be a part.

31 posted on 06/24/2014 9:28:06 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Re: “The New York Times reports that House Majority Whip Kevin McCarthy is considered “the best hope” to win passage of a comprehensive immigration reform bill in Congress after he becomes majority leader in July.”

The Conservative website “Numbers USA” agrees.

The give McCarthy a “F-minus” grade on immigration.

32 posted on 06/24/2014 10:44:45 PM PDT by zeestephen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kabar
Re: “Legal immigration is far more dangerous than illegal immigration.”

I've been pounding that message for the last 9 years at Free Republic.

Tragically, it resonates with almost no one.

Since we stopped the Bush-McCain Amnesty in 2005, the Democrats have registered another 6 million new citizen voters.

Fact is, the Democrats now have enough voters to beat us any time they like.

Turn out is their only problem.

When Blacks, Hispanics, Asians, and single white women begin to vote at the same rate Conservatives vote, the game is up.

33 posted on 06/24/2014 11:04:19 PM PDT by zeestephen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: kvanbrunt2
too much common sense to ever be a politician

Well it's a pretty low bar...but these days I'll take a compliment when I can get it!

lol...

34 posted on 06/25/2014 5:20:58 AM PDT by Fightin Whitey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
"I don't believe there should be citizenship. I believe in the rule of law."

As mostly all lawyers, this should be all of their motto.

Therefore, "they" are breaking the law by allowing this to happen,

Can we arrest those jokers for that? Can we impeach them?

35 posted on 06/25/2014 10:30:08 AM PDT by beachn4fun (Guns are not the problem. People are. Forget the magazine...check your attitude.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson