Sir Isaac Newton was an amatuer scientist = he did it for the love of discovery, And you sir are no Sir Isaac Newton!
This fact is shared amongst most all of the notable scientists from history. The funds they used were mostly their own.
I’ve personally had my fill of you modern-day professional scientists - whether paid for by gov or private corporations - all share in filthy lucre.
Tell me please why is it that nearly everday we have yet another scientific study disproving another scientific study - it’s become a catch 22. The motives would be laid bare if we could all just follow the money trail.
You, obviously, are not a practicing scientist, and are unqualified to make edicts as to how science "is done". Your ignorance is glaring!
My answer to you is this: Your above is precisely how science "is done". Results of conflicting studies are either replicated -- or found to be invalid -- by other research. IOW, one (or both) studies will be invalidated as more and better data are acquired.
Such happens when you probe into the unknown with imperfect tools -- in a continued, honest search for truth.
Only boneheaded dogmatists take a position -- and stick with it -- no matter what the evidence shows.
Consider my #50 to have been written for you too.
Note how I "got into" science -- and take care when you accuse a fellow Christian with "...all share in filthy lucre..." (Or, has your own life been spent working for zero $$$?)
~~~~~~~
You've already "thrown the first stone"... How many such stones will serve to bury your own witness?