Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What Are They Teaching Your Kids About Global Warming? ["scientists" upset]
National Journal ^ | 6/26/2014 | Clare Foran

Posted on 06/26/2014 3:43:34 AM PDT by markomalley

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: markomalley

I watch Suspicious Observer on You Tube every mornimg...and so should school kids....and this man made BS global warmimg debate would be over!

No longer is the public schools promoting patriotism...no longer teaching the truth of history...no longer instructing students how to think for themselves.....tbis society is falling...and with the students today graduating without any form of social skills...will become dormant soon enough...


21 posted on 06/26/2014 4:58:26 AM PDT by BCW (Amazon: "Babylon's Covert War" - the Iraq conflict explained in detail)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VeniVidiVici

“...this period of time in our history will be looked at as the Dark Ages Part Deux.”
_______________
Only if we managed to survive it and logic, real scientific method and common sense again become the norm. Otherwise, this era might become known as the “New Enlightenment” (shudder)


22 posted on 06/26/2014 5:02:28 AM PDT by reformedliberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
Here is a very short article your students would understand completely.

(excerpted)

No smoking hot spot

1. The greenhouse signature is missing. We have been looking and measuring for years, and cannot find it.

Each possible cause of global warming has a different pattern of where in the planet the warming occurs first and the most. The signature of an increased greenhouse effect is a hot spot about 10km up in the atmosphere over the tropics. We have been measuring the atmosphere for decades using radiosondes: weather balloons with thermometers that radio back the temperature as the balloon ascends through the atmosphere. They show no hot spot. Whatsoever.

If there is no hot spot then an increased greenhouse effect is not the cause of global warming. So we know for sure that carbon emissions are not a significant cause of the global warming. If we had found the greenhouse signature then I would be an alarmist again.


23 posted on 06/26/2014 5:17:11 AM PDT by TigersEye ("No man left behind" means something different to 0bama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
Ninety-seven percent of climate scientists agree that global warming is underway and human activity is the primary cause.

 "JUST the place for a Snark!" the Bellman cried,
    As he landed his crew with care;
  Supporting each man on the top of the tide
    By a finger entwined in his hair.

 "Just the place for a Snark! I have said it twice:
    That alone should encourage the crew.
  Just the place for a Snark! I have said it thrice:
    What I tell you three times is true."

 From:  "The Hunting of the Snark" by Lewis Carroll

24 posted on 06/26/2014 5:20:30 AM PDT by Peet (Liberals are the feces that are created when shame eats too much stupid. -Dale Gribble)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
said Colorado science teacher Cheryl Manning. "I want my students to come away understanding that human activity has caused global warming. But I don't tell them that explicitly."


25 posted on 06/26/2014 5:22:38 AM PDT by TigersEye ("No man left behind" means something different to 0bama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Ronin

It’s a textbook example of the “bandwagon fallacy” anyway.


26 posted on 06/26/2014 5:29:39 AM PDT by Campion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Ronin
Here's why: Ninety-seven percent of climate scientists agree that global warming is underway and human activity is the primary cause. This has been debunked so many times that every time I read it I want to scream, but they still keep throwing it out. Sigh...

Exactly. I stopped reading right there. This article is not worthy of my time.

27 posted on 06/26/2014 5:34:47 AM PDT by Blennos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
cientists insist that teaching the controversy—and not the consensus—is a dereliction of duty and a propagation of falsehood.

And in a nutshell, that's what's wrong with "education" today. It's all about teaching rote facts (and the theory du jour as fact) instead of giving students the TOOLS they need to succeed after school.

Math and English are basics. The sciences are more about teaching the scientific method and logic. History/Social Studies develops critical thinking.

Innovation comes from CHALLENGING the consensus, not accepting it. If not, we'd all still be believing the earth was flat, and that the sun revolved around the earth.

28 posted on 06/26/2014 5:36:37 AM PDT by cincinnati65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
The scientific consensus, however, has no equivalent political agreement.

"Scientific consensus" is an oxymoron promoted by Marxists. If it is real science, it is provable thru experimentation and observation. There is no majority vote on E=MC2.


29 posted on 06/26/2014 5:43:24 AM PDT by Flick Lives ("I can't believe it's not Fascism!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
Ninety-seven percent of climate scientists agree that global warming is underway and human activity is the primary cause.

Flat out lie.

30 posted on 06/26/2014 5:46:33 AM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear (Proud Infidel, Gun Nut, Religious Fanatic and Freedom Fiend)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Campion

Exactly, the majority of academia was for the idea that the Earth was the center of the universe throughout the 15th and 16th centuries, look where that idea is now.


31 posted on 06/26/2014 6:25:07 AM PDT by Morpheus2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: cincinnati65

I agree. What’s more is the rediculous alarmist extent that plenty of people go to on the matter. Really? 6 feet of sea level rise in approximately 85 years (2013 to 2099). What does that tell you? Vast groups of people can be wrong, through a behavior known as groupthink.


32 posted on 06/26/2014 6:28:19 AM PDT by Morpheus2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

The school text books teach that the world is getting warmer, along with eco-rationing as the solution.
I counter that the world was warmer when the dinosaurs were running around, since some of them ran around in semi-tropical forests near the poles at that time. Also brought up that it was warmer in other periods between ice ages, so we may get warmer as part of that cycle before getting REALLY cold. It is interesting that no one at school has taught them about ice ages, and to them it is only a series of movies.
I bring up that the sun is the major source of warming. “No, it’s CO2.” Then we talk about why it gets colder when the sun goes down, and warms up once it comes up.
When they are older, I’ll break out video of Penn and Teller’s BS show on Global Warming. They are liberal, but it is still a great rebuttal.


33 posted on 06/26/2014 6:48:27 AM PDT by tbw2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
Georgia teacher Virginia Kirima asks her 11th-grade environmental-science students to debate whether climate change is natural or man-made. According to Kirima, there is no right or wrong answer. ....brilliant. Love this teacher. That's the way it should be handled, IMO.

high school teacher Heather Wygant ensures her students understand the consensus.....:I also spend a lot of time talking about misconceptions and why people don't believe things because I don't want there to be any confusion," she explained.

In other words...."Shut up and believe what I tell you", she explained.

34 posted on 06/26/2014 6:53:42 AM PDT by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
Here's why: Ninety-seven percent of climate scientists agree that global warming is underway and human activity is the primary cause.

Primary conclusion: 97% of climate "scientists" are looking to keep their gravy train of research grants running unencumbered. And they'll happily lie to do so.

35 posted on 06/26/2014 7:14:45 AM PDT by JimRed (Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed & water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS NOW & FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tbw2

They should teach the truth, the climate on earth has been in continuous change for 4 billion years. It never stays the same in the historical time frame.


36 posted on 06/26/2014 8:37:47 AM PDT by jyro (French-like Democrats wave the white flag of surrender while we are winning)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson