Certainly, enough evidence could be brought that there was fraud at a level sufficient to influence the result.
But I can't see an election being reversed on statistical testimony -- which must necessarily be premised on something like "the 95% level of confidence".
Statistical evidence, though, might be sufficient to authorize a re-vote as a remedy -- if Mississippi law provides for such.
It all depends on the judge they take it to.
Pro-Cochran Barbour backed PAC have failed 2 file ANY legally required FEC expenditure reports. Nada since statement of organization. #mssen
Doesn't matter if it doesn't. Courts are free to fashion any remedy they feel like dishing out.
-- But I can't see an election being reversed on statistical testimony --
Neither can I, but at some point, the math works with a precision that is at least as good as the precision of counting the ballots in the first place.