Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Viennacon; Cboldt; don-o
Does Mississippi law even provide for a re-vote?

Certainly, enough evidence could be brought that there was fraud at a level sufficient to influence the result.

But I can't see an election being reversed on statistical testimony -- which must necessarily be premised on something like "the 95% level of confidence".

Statistical evidence, though, might be sufficient to authorize a re-vote as a remedy -- if Mississippi law provides for such.

270 posted on 06/26/2014 4:37:36 PM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: Ignorance on parade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies ]


To: okie01

It all depends on the judge they take it to.


271 posted on 06/26/2014 4:38:49 PM PDT by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 270 | View Replies ]

To: okie01
Charles C. Johnson ‏@ChuckCJohnson 9m

Pro-Cochran Barbour backed PAC have failed 2 file ANY legally required FEC expenditure reports. Nada since statement of organization. #mssen

279 posted on 06/26/2014 4:42:26 PM PDT by don-o (He will not share His glory and He will NOT be mocked! Blessed be the name of the Lord forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 270 | View Replies ]

To: okie01
-- Does Mississippi law even provide for a re-vote? --

Doesn't matter if it doesn't. Courts are free to fashion any remedy they feel like dishing out.

-- But I can't see an election being reversed on statistical testimony --

Neither can I, but at some point, the math works with a precision that is at least as good as the precision of counting the ballots in the first place.

308 posted on 06/26/2014 4:57:40 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 270 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson