I wonder if the pilots lawyer followed up on this:
“Judge Michael Daly Hawkins criticized the I.R.S. for not taking serious action against its lawyers, Kenneth W. McWade, who tried the case, and his supervisor, William A. Sims. The court said the two lawyers ‘’defiled the sanctity of the court and the confidence of all future litigants.’’
The I.R.S. ‘’has done little to punish the misconduct and even less to dissuade future abuse,’’ Judge Hawkins wrote.
He noted that both lawyers received $1,000 bonuses from the I.R.S. for their work in the case. They also received two week suspensions, after which Mr. McWade retired. Mr. Sims continues as an I.R.S. lawyer.
Mr. McWade and Mr. Sims, in testimony, insisted that they had behaved properly at all times.
Mr. Minns says that he wants both men disbarred, but cannot find a record of their law licenses. He said he wrote to the I.R.S., which replied that it was unaware of where they are licensed either, but noting that it only looked in a public directory of lawyers and not in its own files.”
Yeah, I doubt that, too. So here’s my question. Shouldn’t Issa call the leaker in to question his motivation? What if it turns out that this case is the Rosetta stone of the IRS abuses, that homosexual activist IRS employees coordinated their efforts to knee cap conservative groups? They would feel empowered as the political culture values homosexual activism above virtually any other cultural value ( only Obama worship ig in higher esteem, as in , “what did you believe about same sex marriage in 2008, BO?”); they know they will be shielded , not only from the precedent you cite, but because the “nightingale has sung its song” throughout the administration and the media that homosexual activism will be protected and that heterosexual rights defenders will be “Exposed, frozen and neutralized.”