[PieterCasparzen]

So, is just part of the law unconstitutional?

Is this the only part?

This is tossing a bone to conservative sheeple. It helps to keep the illusion that we have a legal system alive.

Does the USSC get effectively ‘line item veto’?

Yes, they've always had that. It's just hard to tell because they almost always simply do what their elite financial masters want them to do, i.e., inflict misery on the sheeple. If SCOTUS did their job, virtually every law passed by Congress would be struck down.

Occasionally the sheeple get tossed a bone so they can think they are "winning". This keeps the sheeple playing the game. If the sheeple were never tossed a bone, they'd stop working. Given how many sheeple have stopped working in the past few years, and how SCOTUS has inflicted such misery on them in the past few years, SCOTUS needed to toss the sheeple a bone.

[Triple]

Does the law have to have a ‘severability’ clause to be struck down in part?

(The line item change is effectively legislation.)