[alancarp]

" “Suppose an employer’s sincerely held religious belief is offended by health coverage of vaccines, or paying the minimum wage, or according women equal pay for substantially similar work?”

Well, that's a supposition, isn't it? Stop inventing arguments that aren't being brought before the court and deal strictly with the ones before you!

P.S. - that vaccines thing would be the Jehovah's witnesses of several decades ago, but apparently they got over whatever whacky 'Biblical justification' they had.

[SeekAndFind]

RE: P.S. - that vaccines thing would be the Jehovah’s witnesses of several decades ago, but apparently they got over whatever whacky ‘Biblical justification’ they had.

Actually vaccines are an objection from Christian Scientists. Jehovah’s Witnesses object to blood transfusions.

But even if the Jehovah’s Witnesses do, where in the constitution does it tell us that a business SHOULD provide this or that healthcare ( or for that matter, ANY HEALTHCARE ) for its employees?

If they don’t, YOU DON’T HAVE TO WORK FOR THEM.