Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind
RE: He got a promise from King Obama himself that the law wouldn’t do that. Mr. Stupak was satisfied, and he voted for the “new” law, with those provisions.

I just went back to look at this. Found out some interesting information.

Obama pulled the old "bait and switch." He told Stupak that institutions and individuals wouldn't have to pay for abortions over their moral objections. Obama even signed an executive order to that effect--how magnanimous of him. But it looks like those provisions may have been left out of the law itself. Why am I not surprised?

57 posted on 06/30/2014 2:17:35 PM PDT by Jess Kitting
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: Jess Kitting

You bet baraq pulled a bait and switch, but Stupak’s mistake was believing a democrat.


59 posted on 06/30/2014 2:19:26 PM PDT by Texas resident (The democrat party is the CPUSA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

To: Jess Kitting
Obama even signed an executive order to that effect--how magnanimous of him.

Did you happen to note what # Executive Order that was?
I'd love to have it for reference.
I wonder how many contradictory EOs he has issued?

75 posted on 06/30/2014 3:40:01 PM PDT by publius911 ( Politicians come and go... but the (union) bureaucracy lives and grows forever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson