There is another case peculating up that challenges the ACA based on the origination of the penalty that was determined to not be a penalty but a tax coming out of the Senate. If that is not overturned it means the origination clause is meaningless with the Senate stripping any bill from the House and inserting any new tax.
“There is another case peculating up that challenges the ACA based on the origination of the penalty that was determined to not be a penalty but a tax coming out of the Senate. If that is not overturned it means the origination clause is meaningless with the Senate stripping any bill from the House and inserting any new tax”
This is the most clear cut constitutional reason the ACA should not of passed mustard with the SCOTUS. Did not the Lawyer fighting against the ACA before the Supreme Court or any of the 4 dissenting Judges not bring this most simple of concepts up in the discussion?
Yes i’m waiting for that case too cmwy!