I guess you missed the part of the article where it said the attack was “unprovoked”.
An unprovoked crime doesn’t indicate to me that it was triggered by a burst of anger. But I guess it is possible that some folk go through life always filled with anger and rage. Since I’m not like that I have difficulty identifying with it.
So I’m sticking with my one-on-one jihad assessment.
“An unprovoked crime doesn’t indicate to me that it was triggered by a burst of anger.”
You have never seen a player at a sporting event get angry at a ref without the ref provoking the player?!?
“So I’m sticking with my one-on-one jihad assessment.”
So, let me get this straight. In your opinion, this guy just goes around looking for infidels to kill, and he decides the best way to kill them is to deliver a single punch, in the midst of a soccer game he is playing in, knocking them unconscious but not killing them, and then leave, just hoping that they later die from their injuries. Do I have that about right?