Literal reading in the context of intent. The First Amendment says “NO law” . .but we still punish defamation/fire in the theater et al
Gaming the system was never the intent.
No, of course it was not, but if we don't use the actual language to interpret, we have a disaster.
I understand the INTENT of "subject to the jurisdiction of", but, let's face it, if you can be detained, brought before a judge, have your possessions confiscated, and be sent to a third world sh**hole, then, by common understanding, you are "subject to the jurisdiction" of the United States.
All I'm saying is that I do not believe there is a non-amendment fix for this problem.