He may have been in on it when Obama’s publisher’s bio stated he was born in Kenya until just a couple years ago, too.
It's as if we went into Matthew Mosk life and reported on organizations he belongs to... clubs he's been a part of ... innuendos - nothing truly revealed - but disquieting none the less.
If Danielle Allen wanted to set the record straight on rumors of Obama being Muslim (rumors I doubt) - and Matt wants to help her - they could start with interviewing a Muslim Imams. "IS a person born of a Muslim father considered Muslim?". I've heard it both ways.
Maybe Danielle Allen or Matthew Mosk could take 20 minutes - call a mosque and ask. Write a few paragraphs about the picture of Obama wearing Muslim garb in what appeared to be a ceremony. Could I have an explanation?
Would Matthew Mosk ask about a Republican President IF that Republican had been photographed in the bed-sheets of a KKK member when he was in his twenties? Would a liberal dare to ask if that Republican had a racist background? We ask the same of a person dressed in Muslim garb... is that really so different?
Or Matt could explain the difference between the underlying reality of Obama's policies in the ME and the the words he puts out - words the exact opposite of what we see. ME's on the brink of total war, stable countries have morphed into radical Muslim states...fledgling democracies have been toppled, the United States appears to be working with Iran, and working against Israel. How does that fit with the words put out? Why are the two so different?
Obama and Holder talk against Mexican drug cartels but they gave them arms... WITHOUT tracking devices. The words: against cartels. The actions: armed cartels. Explain the coincidence of drug cartels and Chicago? Comfort conservatives by looking into things rather than pointing fingers at those of us who question... The problem is NOT the messenger...
Obama's 'words' on the ME - Arab Spring gobbledygook - belies the ugly reality. Can Matthew Mosk of the Washington Post or Danielle Allen understand how we might question the gulf between the words and what we see with our own eyes?
If a Republican President had said he was supporting Mandala and was going to fight apartheid - then AFTER 6 years Mandela was put back in prison and blacks were booted out of all political offices, would YOU Matt or YOU Danielle - question the chasm between the words and the results? Damn right you would. Matthew Mosk and Danielle Allen. You would wake up - - sound the alarms. But if conservatives dare to notice the miles between Obama's words and the reality of his actions - we're condemned.
This piece was designed to strip us of our right to speak freely - to instill fear in us. The reality of the intent has been noted.
It's as if we went into Matthew Mosk life and reported on organizations he belongs to... clubs he's been a part of ... innuendos - nothing truly revealed - but disquieting none the less.
If Danielle Allen wanted to set the record straight on rumors of Obama being Muslim (I suspect he's agnostic) - and Matt wants to help her - they could start with interviewing a Muslim Imams. "IS a person born of a Muslim father considered Muslim?". I've heard it both ways.
Maybe Danielle Allen or Matthew Mosk could take 20 minutes - call a mosque and ask. Then write a few paragraphs about the picture of Obama wearing Muslim garb in what appeared to be a ceremony. Could I have an explanation?
Would Matthew Mosk ask about a Republican President IF that Republican had been photographed in the bed-sheets of a KKK member - when he was in his twenties? Would a liberal dare to ask if that Republican had a racist background? Of course they would. We ask the same about a person dressed in Muslim garb... is that really so different?
Or Matt could explain the difference between the underlying reality of Obama's policies in the ME and the the words he puts out - words the exact opposite of what we see. The ME's on the brink of total war, stable countries have morphed into radical Muslim states...fledgling democracies have been toppled, the United States appears to be working with Iran, and working against Israel. How does that fit with the words put out? Why are the two so different?
Obama and Holder talk against Mexican drug cartels but they gave them arms... WITHOUT tracking devices. The words: against cartels. The actions: armed cartels. Explain the coincidence of drug cartels and Chicago? Comfort conservatives by looking into things rather than pointing fingers at those of us who question... The problem is NOT the messenger...
Obama's 'words' on the ME - Arab Spring gobbledygook - belies the ugly reality. Can Matthew Mosk of the Washington Post or Danielle Allen understand how we might question the gulf between the words and what we see with our own eyes?
If a Republican President had said he was supporting Mandala and was going to fight apartheid - then AFTER 6 years Mandela was put back in prison and blacks were booted out of all political offices, would YOU Matt or YOU Danielle - question the chasm between the words and the results? Damn right you would. Matthew Mosk and Danielle Allen. You would wake up - - sound the alarms. But if conservatives dare to notice the miles between Obama's words and the reality of his actions - we're condemned.
This piece was designed to strip us of our right to speak freely - to instill fear in us. The reality of the intent has been noted.