this story reminds me of why I turned against George W Bush.
in 2004 or so, Bush decided it was a good idea to supply
JAM and everyone else in Iraq with gasoline at 5 cents a gallon.
don’t believe me? read here.
http://www.rense.com/general53/tedx.htm
the reason Bush did that, IMO, is that at the time, Bush did not
like the term ‘civil war’ applied to the conflict,
he preferred ‘insurgency’. so —>
the enemy was well supplied.
for several reasons, I did not like that.
On Cheney’s involvement, I will comment some other time.
attn Bush:
thanks a lot for losses in 2006 and 2008.
what do others Freepers think?
I see in your posting history you’re a real cheerleader for ISIS.
If you like the caliphate then go there and enjoy your rewards. You won’t find any of us here receptive to your crap.
the reason Bush did that, IMO, is that at the time, Bush did not
like the term ‘civil war’ applied to the conflict,
he preferred ‘insurgency’. so —>
the enemy was well supplied.
for several reasons, I did not like that.
On Cheney’s involvement, I will comment some other time.
Please explain what the relationship of dirt cheap gasoline to an insurgency vs a civil is? And what role of VP Cheney are you alluding to?
Your comments are cryptic but most interesting.