Posted on 07/08/2014 9:32:13 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
Author Ed Klein, whose new book Blood Feud chronicles the antagonistic relationship between President Barrack Obama and former first family Bill and Hillary Clinton, claims that Obama has handpicked a successor for the 2016 presidential race. The Washington Times reports:
Writing in the New York Post, Mr. Klein said: “Publicly, Obama has remained noncommittal on the 2016 race, but privately he worries that Clinton would undo and undermine many of his policies. There’s also a personal animosity, especially with Bill Clinton, that dates from their tough race six years ago.
“Obama has authorized his chief political adviser, Valerie Jarrett, to conduct a full-court press to convince Warren to throw her hat into the ring,” Mr. Klein wrote. “In the past several weeks, Jarrett has held a series of secret meetings with Warren. During these meetings, Jarrett has explained to Warren that Obama is worried that if Hillary succeeds him in the White House, she will undo many of his policies.”
Mr. Klein said similarly on “Fox & Friends” Monday morning, calling Mrs. Warren a big draw for the progressive-minded who have cheered many of Mr. Obama’s policies.
Warren may prove more dangerous to the remains of our American republic than either Obama or Clinton. That’s because, unlike those bigger names, Warren knows what she believes and precisely why she believes it. As seen in the clip above, Warren stands as a confident and articulate minister of the progressive gospel. She sees property seizure and redistribution as a moral imperative, a sacred obligation consented to by the act of acquiring wealth. Take another look at her remarks.
(Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...
The liberal elites have always hated the Clintons. They tolerated them because they thought it was the only way to win the big election, but they looked down on the Clintons as being backwoods southern hicks. They never forgave Bill C. for passing welfare reform.
I’ve heard Mark Levin talk on his show about E. Warren quite a bit. Apparently, a while back he had her on his show to explain her “wonderful idea” of confiscating people’s 401K’s, IRA’s, etc. and requiring them to contribute to a government retirement plan instead.
I wonder if anyone will bring this to the attention of the general public?
I think that the majority of Americans are smart enough to stop voting for presidents as some sort of social experiment…a black, a woman, an hispanic, a one-armed paper hanger, etc…..
Voters are going to look for someone who actually knows how to get the job done. And THAT might be Obama’s legacy. I think conservatives, Republicans, and even libertarians might find a way to unite behind that principle and defeat the libtards.
She’s a radical put up to make Hillary look like a moderate.
Basically a sacrificial trial balloon.
The real question is, "Who is the power behind Valerie?"
They despised the “Third Way” because it involved compromising with the opposition.
Ah, the faux Indian, millionaire, and class-warfare agitator.
Basically a sacrificial trial balloon.
I think you're right!
That’s what they said about Obama when he first threw his hat into the Presidential ring.
Lucifer
It’s a funnier picture if you fold it just right.....
Sooner or later, I suspect some considerable number of her former students will step forward with hard details about Warren's inner shrew/harridan/Xantippe.
Not even all the Regressives in the "press" will buy into the sundry lies this high-cheekboned moral slattern will perforce be spouting, should she run.
It is past time that people start focusing on Elizabeth Warren and her very radical ideas. I have been saying that Hillary is just a place holder for the Democrat party to avoid in depth analysis of the eventual nominee.
RE: I’ve heard Mark Levin talk on his show about E. Warren quite a bit. Apparently, a while back he had her on his show to explain her “wonderful idea” of confiscating people’s 401K’s, IRA’s, etc. and requiring them to contribute to a government retirement plan instead.
I wonder if anyone will bring this to the attention of the general public?
__________________________________
If Republicans choose another one like Mitt Romney, who preferred to be known as a nice guy and then let the whole Benghazi issue go in a debate, then this issue will simply be set aside.
...”Warren stands as a confident and articulate minister of ‘the Progressive Gospel’......She sees property seizure and redistribution as a moral imperative, a sacred obligation consented to by the act of acquiring wealth”....
And that gospel is anti-american and anti-Christian.
Warren?!? Ha! Please, please, please nominate her, she’d be even worse on the campaign trail than Hillary.
Let's get a little tricky here, OK? What Joe K is really doing is making Obama look bad to benefit Hillary. No marketing mystery there. The gay Kenyan is slipping in the polls and by the time '16 rolls around he will really be the turd in the Democrat punch bowl. His recommendation? Could be the Kiss'O'Death.
Joe Klein and the Clinto/Soros camp are going through the separation stage with Barry.
"Ya see, I told, TOLD HIM, I say, not to do that in Benghazi!"
The "plan" has always been for the Gay Luo Lothario to take the heat ... while Hillary comes in and consolidates the Socialist State. Not only is she twice the ideologue, she is at least twice as smart that as the rather dim Obama is.
There is a possible alternative scenario for '16, too. By then the real economy will be so irretrievably bad that the Democrats may not even want the WH. The Communists are long-term thinkers and even the most optimistic economists I know are telling me "No recovery until the mid-20s."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.