Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EternalVigilance
"The appellee and certain amici argue that the fetus is a 'person' within the language and meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment."

What Blackmun totally avoids is any opinion on what exactly the unborn child IS if not a person? Did he believe that there was doubt? Did he think that the unborn child could turn out to be, for instance, a giraffe and not a person?

Perhaps Blackmun believed that unborn children are nothing more than "clumps of cells." But, isn't EVERY PERSON just a "clump of cells" when you get right down to it?

11 posted on 07/08/2014 10:37:28 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: wagglebee

Blackmun isn’t even that, anymore, as he screams in Hell where he belongs. He pushed Rowe v Wade through for the feminist agenda being pushed by the globalist who wanted America destroyed. Blackmun didn’t care if these alive unborn are human beings or not. He was god when he sentenced them to slaughter.


12 posted on 07/08/2014 10:41:08 AM PDT by MHGinTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

And the Mona Lisa is just clumps of paint on a canvas.


13 posted on 07/08/2014 10:41:39 AM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson