Really? You are accusing ME of sounding like the feminists who oppose Hobby Lobby? I've been called a lot of things on here, but hearing that I'm supporting the feminist pro-abortion agenda is certainly a new one.
Predicating public assistance on the use of contraception is not the same thing as saying people can't have children.
EVERY argument eugenicists has included an assurance that it wasn't going to be as bad as their opponents said. They say things like it will be "safe and legal and rare."
Ultimately, the result is always MUCH WORSE than what the opponents of the eugenicists feared.
Don't despair though, you've basically gotten your way all along. Big Murder places their abortuaries almost exclusively in poor, inner city areas. The poor and minorities are far more likely to murder their babies than more white and more affluent women.
That aside, the critical premise is that, when government pays a person, government aquires ownership of that person. You may judge that persons receiving unearned benefits are harming you economically, and perhaps personally. I can make that same judgment about certain employees of my local school district, whose specific titles and salaries I know.
In neither case does the passage of money, and the perception of harm, legitimately convey control over the person's body and soul.