Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Typical Harry Reid. Can't wait to see that bastard kicked into the minority.
1 posted on 07/10/2014 10:09:20 AM PDT by Second Amendment First
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Second Amendment First

Congress is a bunch of neutered turds. They can debate until the cows come home, it will not matter. King hussein has a pen, a phone, and will rule by decree to overturn any law not to his liking. If you cross him, expect the full wrath of the federal regime to come down on you like a ton of bricks. Being CiC has its perks you know.


2 posted on 07/10/2014 10:20:42 AM PDT by factoryrat (We are the producers, the creators. Grow it, mine it, build it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First
Typical Harry Reid. Can't wait to see that bastard kicked into the minority.

Can't wait to see him sent to the recycle bin, he's not even fit for Soylent Green.

3 posted on 07/10/2014 10:27:17 AM PDT by Mastador1 (I'll take a bad dog over a good politician any day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First

Good to see the Republicans aren’t bending to Democrat political pressure to help the ‘Rats’ reelection campaigns. If this does get passed, it had better have some actual pro-rights amendments. Pretty much any of the following would do it for me:

1. National Concealed Carry Reciprocity
2. Restoration of Rights for veterans
3. End Operation Chokepoint
4. Abolish the ATF for all time and have its responsibilities entirely dropped (not picked up by anyone else)
5. Repeal the unconstitutional Gun-Free School Zone Act
6. Repeal the unconstitutional GCA and NFA
7. Hold anti-rights politicians to the same standards as their constituents (if we can’t have guns, they can’t have guns—and neither can their bodyguards)

Oh, and there had better not be any stupid anti-rights amendments, either. If those ‘Rats want to bolster their pro-2A credentials, make ‘em work for it!


4 posted on 07/10/2014 10:29:54 AM PDT by lcms rev
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First

Apparently, an entire government-run playpen filled with mentally defective post-adolescent lawyers can’t figure out what “shall not be infringed” means.


6 posted on 07/10/2014 10:42:02 AM PDT by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First
Can't wait to see that bastard kicked into the minority eternity.
7 posted on 07/10/2014 11:56:34 AM PDT by Max in Utah (A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First

Sorry, I don’t see how this is any victory for Pubs. They have and issue that actually does have widespread bipartisan support, and that’s good for gun owners (especially those that hunt), and they stall it because they can’t add amendments that won’t pass if they are added to the bill. Nothing but a beltway pissing contest.


8 posted on 07/10/2014 1:30:55 PM PDT by Hugin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First

Well, after the bill issue is compromised, fishermen and hunters can enjoy smiling at the new pan-zoom-tilt cameras mounted in remote areas on the CO Rockies (not to mention the perpetual cloud of pot smoke everywhere).


9 posted on 07/10/2014 1:38:21 PM PDT by familyop (We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of corruption smelled around the planet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson