Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Adelson, Buffett, Gates: Wealthy Trio Pushes Citizenship for Illegals
The New American ^ | Friday, 11 July 2014 | Warren Mass

Posted on 07/11/2014 4:08:45 PM PDT by Resettozero

In a July 10 op-ed piece in the New York Times, three of America’s wealthiest and most powerful business magnates — Sheldon Adelson, Warren Buffett, and Bill Gates — lamented that “immigration reform” legislation is having such difficulty in getting though Congress.

After praising two aspects (the “talented graduate” provision and the “pathway to citizenship,” or amnesty provision) of the bipartisan “Gang of Eight” bill that the Senate approved last June 27 by a 68-to-32 vote, the three men called for the House to follow suit:

Whatever the precise provisions of a law, it’s time for the House to draft and pass a bill that reflects both our country’s humanity and its self-interest. Differences with the Senate should be hammered out by members of a conference committee, committed to a deal.

Continuing their plea, Adelson, Buffett, and Gates wrote:

Signs of a more productive attitude in Washington — which passage of a well-designed immigration bill would provide — might well lift spirits and thereby stimulate the economy. It’s time for 535 of America’s citizens to remember what they owe to the 318 million who employ them.

Both the Senate bill (S. 744) passed in 2013, and the House version (H.R. 15) that has stalled (precisely because it echoes the same flaws as the Senate bill), are titled the “Border Security, Economic Opportunity, and Immigration Modernization Act.” Among the 32 senators voting against the bill were such outspoken opponents of granting amnesty to illegal immigrants as Ted Cruz (R-Texas), Rand Paul (R-Ken.), Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.), and Richard Shelby (R-Ala.).

(Excerpt) Read more at thenewamerican.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: aliens; amnesty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last
To: Resettozero

Nobody should be surprised.

The next civil war is going to be ugly.


21 posted on 07/11/2014 4:49:44 PM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: re_nortex

Adelson has always been for open borders as far as I can remember. Just like the Wall Street Journal.


22 posted on 07/11/2014 4:50:35 PM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: re_nortex

Adelson owns casinos and hotels that require lots of little mescuns to clean up white mans trash and dirt he leaves behind. Cheep, cheep labor is all he is interested in, improves his bottom line ya know?

Other than that he could give a crap about illegal aliens.


23 posted on 07/11/2014 4:52:35 PM PDT by biff (WAS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: re_nortex

I don’t care how much money Adelson or any other billionaire makes. I just want business and government to go back to their respective corners and stay there.


24 posted on 07/11/2014 4:52:45 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: mrsmith

The Lear jet leftists expect to form the core of the global Green Inner Party. There they will continue to enjoy the finest foods and most advanced gadgets the world has to offer — while deciding your fate for you.

If you work very hard and show them your unwavering loyalty you may be permitted to join the global Green Outer Party. You will be allowed occasional servings of meat - and air conditioning on a rationed basis.

The rest of us will eat insects and swelter — for the good of the planet.


25 posted on 07/11/2014 4:52:49 PM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Yep.

A lot of people aren’t so clear cut, as Adelson’s substantial support for TEA Party types like Richard Mourdock, Allen West and Ted Cruz demonstrates.


26 posted on 07/11/2014 4:52:59 PM PDT by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: nascarnation

And they’re right.


27 posted on 07/11/2014 4:54:27 PM PDT by stevio (God, guns, guts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
The next civil war is going to be ugly.

Last one wasn't pretty either. Lost family members on both sides...literally brother against brother. Not a nice time, I understand.
28 posted on 07/11/2014 4:55:05 PM PDT by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Resettozero

bump


29 posted on 07/11/2014 4:55:38 PM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: re_nortex

Adelson was never a “conservative” as we would use the term here on FR. He’s a big-government globalist just like the rest of these @ssholes that purchase favors inside the Beltway.


30 posted on 07/11/2014 4:55:38 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("What in the wide, wide world of sports is goin' on here?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Resettozero

On the bright side.... couch potatoes make good human shields... I mean protective cover


31 posted on 07/11/2014 4:56:11 PM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
Adelson has always been for open borders as far as I can remember. Just like the Wall Street Journal.

Thanks, GeronL, for that information. As Rick said in Casablanca, I was misinformed about Sheldon Adelson. The numerous favorable posts about the man here on Free Republic during the 2012 presidential primary led to me believe that he was on the right side. It now seems I was quite mistaken.

When did Adelson shed his Conservatism? I have to think that the obama regime was responsible for his change. Or did that happen even before hussein stole the 2008 and 2012 elections?

32 posted on 07/11/2014 4:56:26 PM PDT by re_nortex (DP - that's what I like about Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

It’s for Ramadan, silly. He had forgo most of his observance of Ramadan in 2012, and I don’t remember what he did last year, but this year, it’s back to his roots.


33 posted on 07/11/2014 4:57:52 PM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: re_nortex

To be fair to FReepers like yourself, there were plenty of outsiders who showed up to drive the narrative one way or the other for their guy.


34 posted on 07/11/2014 5:02:23 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: re_nortex

I don’t begrudge billionaires their money when they earn it legitimately. When they import cheap third world labor or collude with politicians to carve out special deals, that’s when I definitely oppose expanding their wealth. These billionaires use government against their fellow American citizens. Their motives aren’t honorable. How does more immigration from the socialistic, third world help you or I? It doesn’t.

Call me a Marxist if you want, but it wouldn’t upset me much if government fleeced these billionaires for every dime they own. Except that’s not how it works, and the ultra rich know it. Income taxes don’t have a significant impact on those who are already wealthy. Their wealth is secure. They aren’t afraid of government. They indirectly OWN our government. Disagree? Then why is it that “our” elected leaders keep pushing amnesty and expanded legal immigration even when most Americans oppose it?

I also couldn’t care less about Adelson’s casinos which are very likely dependent on very cheap, imported labor. Again, it would be different if these billionaires weren’t trying to use government policy against me and mine. If you wanted to pad your nest at my expense, I’d say you don’t need to make more money, too.


35 posted on 07/11/2014 5:18:24 PM PDT by CitizenUSA (Proverbs 14:34 Righteousness exalts a nation, but sin is a disgrace to any people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

“Adelson was never a “conservative” as we would use the term here on FR.”

That’s my understanding, too. He’s on our side on a few issues, but he’s apparently a social liberal. That doesn’t surprise me as he makes (made) a lot of his money off of vice, i.e. casinos.


36 posted on 07/11/2014 5:31:10 PM PDT by CitizenUSA (Proverbs 14:34 Righteousness exalts a nation, but sin is a disgrace to any people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: All

‘Bill Whittle: Where Do You Live Mark Zuckerberg?’

The crisis on the Mexican border is worsening by the hour. In his latest FIREWALL, Bill Whittle hammers home three devastating points regarding the dangerous legal precedents, the morally gray areas, and the hypocritical pose of unearned moral superiority on the part of those proposing amnesty and open borders.

http://www.truthrevolt.org/videos/bill-whittle-where-do-you-live-mark-zuckerberg


37 posted on 07/11/2014 6:31:22 PM PDT by Hotlanta Mike (‘You can avoid reality, but you can’t avoid the consequences of avoiding reality.’)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson