Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Squawk 8888

Are you referring to the infamous Canadian content laws? The same ones that gave us Bob and Doug McKenzie?

CC


8 posted on 07/12/2014 1:57:53 PM PDT by Celtic Conservative (tease not the dragon for thou art crunchy when roasted and taste good with ketchup)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Celtic Conservative

They were subject to CanCon but that was not the issue here because (1) Canadian tastes are different from those of Americans, (2) there was a *lot* of excellent Canadian music being released, and (3) they needed to differentiate themselves from MTV that was available via satellite.

The real problem was that the CRTC, Canada’s broadcast regulator, is in the habit of micromanaging format and content. The biggest headache for all specialty TV channels is the capricious manner in which they regulate competition; a good example of this was their decision that three TV stations in Toronto was too much for Bell to control but it was OK for Bell to sell one of them to Rogers, which already owned two TV stations, three radio stations and the cable company here.


11 posted on 07/12/2014 2:25:10 PM PDT by Squawk 8888 (Lacrosse- Canada's national sport, like hockey only violent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson