First and foremost, I didn’t mean it as a smear. It’s just a saying meaning “unduly alarmed.” I can’t of course define legitimacy of anybody else’s level of alarm, there are just some things I can’t really get too worked up about.
To address your specific points:
1) I assume that by an attack on religious freedom, you mean gay rights. It’s unfortunate that the way things are playing out, it’s a zero-sum game, and the homos and their enablers in the government are taking things way, way, WAY too far with the forcing of private businesses to comply with their way of thinking.
But it doesn’t have to be that way. I wouldn’t wish to deprive anybody of their rights at any time for any reason. I can think of a million ways accommodations can be reached and find it sad and sometimes pathetic that they aren’t.
2) I have absolutely no idea what you mean by “abusing natural laws.”
3) What precisely do legalizing a product and a dependency cycle have to do with one another? Are you saying that marijuana somehow inevitably and inexorably leads to dependence on government? If so, that’s just plain not true.
You may have any objections you wish to the sexual revolution and its effects. It’s certainly your right and I’m sure we could find lots of agreement on specific issues. On the whole, though, I think it’s been more beneficial than harmful and the ills that it has created are (or could relatively easily be) manageable. Just my opinion, of course.