I think that was a tongue-in-cheek statement. He was trying to be humorous, but, there is a lot more truth to that than people realize. It would surprise you if you knew how many people, from all walks of life, do some type of recreational drug. That is a “huge” voting bloc. You just wouldn’t believe.
“That is a “huge” voting bloc. You just wouldn’t believe.”
If you combine recreational drug users with the prescription drug users then you easily hit 70-85%. I lump them together because a very large number of prescription users are really just “legal” recreational users who in no way need 90 hydrocodon (sp) per month.
My point was that his statement was both in-eloquent, poorly worded, and rather stupid sounding.
I am not referring to the facts of the debate - just his personal messaging style. It was stupidly done.
I do not need pristine candidates - I just am sick of really stupid ones who say stupid things in a very stupid way.
Communication = Influence = politics.