To: Din Maker
This is the price you pay for not getting behind ONE primary challenger who could have defeated Linda.
9 posted on
07/16/2014 7:00:38 AM PDT by
bigbob
(The best way to get a bad law repealed is to enforce it strictly. Abraham Lincoln)
To: bigbob
This is the price you pay for not getting behind ONE primary challenger who could have defeated Linda.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Now, that is true in Presidential Primaries. One Moderate (Romney) against a gazillion Conservatives who divided up the vote and Romney waltzes to the nomination. But, in this case, that does not hold true. Graham got over 56 percent of the vote. Whether you get 56% against one guy or five, you still win. Your logic does not apply here.
13 posted on
07/16/2014 7:08:05 AM PDT by
Din Maker
(Time to insure GOP will NOT get control of Senate. If you don't like revenge, you've never tasted it)
To: bigbob
South Carolina has runoffs, and Goober got a flat-out majority.
22 posted on
07/16/2014 7:46:00 AM PDT by
TBP
(Obama lies, Granny dies.)
To: bigbob
.
This is the price you pay for not getting behind ONE primary challenger who could have defeated Linda.
Actually, time will show that at least 2/3 of Lindsay's challengers were paid-in-full Dark Horse candidates ...
all hand-picked by The Beauty Queen Himself.
.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson