She had to think that the frame would succeed, that the false narrative in her faked letters would seem plausible to the jury that would convict her husband. If Nathan Richardson is not a conservative, she would have set up the frame differently.
The letters do not sound to me like they were written by a conservative. The sound like they were written by a leftist having a typically ridicuolous fantasy of what a conservative would write.
If Shannon Richardson is a Democrat, that would explain why her party affiliation was not reported by the MSM.
Just guesses. I could easily be wrong.
ridicuolous > ridiculous