My pie in the sky opinion. If a state has access to natural resources which would benefit not only the residents of their state but the U.S. as well and chooses to not allow their development, that state should not benefit from the same resources currently provided to them by other states.
Has Obama even consulted with the states along the Atlantic coast?
Or, is this just another example of Obama violating States’ Rights?
What does that mean? Are you suggesting the federal government forbid other states of selling resources to them?