To: Uncle Chip
“Monitors from the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) were prevented from conducting their investigation by militiamen during their first trip to the scene. “
The organization itself has sent out an official tweet response saying that this story is fraudulent, that they were not shot at during their visit.
“In response to media reports our monitors were not shot at while visiting #MH17 crash site today. “
https://twitter.com/OSCE_SMM
4 posted on
07/18/2014 8:40:56 PM PDT by
Mount Athos
(A Giant luxury mega-mansion for Gore, a Government Green EcoShack made of poo for you)
To: Mount Athos
The story says “warning shots” — are they disputing that???
To: Mount Athos
The organization itself has sent out an official tweet response saying that this story is fraudulent, that they were not shot at during their visit. There must be a mistake, western media wouldn't lie about something like this...why would they?
8 posted on
07/18/2014 8:48:52 PM PDT by
mac_truck
( Aide toi et dieu t aidera)
To: Mount Athos
The organization itself has sent out an official tweet response saying that this story is fraudulent, that they were not shot at during their visit. The organization itself has sent out an official tweet response saying that this story is fraudulent, that they were not shot at during their visit. “In response to media reports our monitors were not shot at while visiting #MH17 crash site today. “The tweet I saw didn't show the OSCE describing the story as "fraudulent".
The story claimed that there were warning shots fired.
The OSCE claim is that they were "not shot at".
The two statements don't contradict each other.
Do you know the difference between firing a shot directly at somebody and firing a warning shot?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson