[ansel12]

If Russia wants to disappear, the can take on NATO in a war, you seem to forget that we can nuke them back to the stone age.

[FreedomStar3028]

If that happens we also get nuked into the stone age. Mutually assured destruction.

[BobL]

“If Russia wants to disappear, the can take on NATO in a war, you seem to forget that we can nuke them back to the stone age.”

Likely true before Obama became president, but we don’t have much left now, and we have NO CLUE as to whether what we’re left with even works anymore.

So I don’t think we want to find out, which makes them useless and Putin knows that.

[Caipirabob]

If Russia wants to disappear, the can take on NATO in a war, you seem to forget that we can nuke them back to the stone age.

That is, if obama doesn't decide to go on another "apology tour".

[Fear The People]

If Russia wants to disappear, the can take on NATO in a war, you seem to forget that we can nuke them back to the stone age.

Not only that, but nukes are useful against concentrated populations - CITIES.

American cities are already destroyed by the left:
Let's suppose there is a nuclear exchange...
AMERICA:

• Detroit
• Chicago
• East St. Louis
• Atlanta
• New Orleans
• Oakland
• Killadelphia
• etc...

These cities were once prosperous gems, but they are now toilets needing to be flushed. Russia would only be able to destroy America's cities with its nukes - blue cities all and mostly ghettos.

America's productive and 'red' population is dispersed widely and is not concentrated in cities.

Red state folks would be the survivors.

RUSSIA
All of Russia's valuable and productive assets ARE concentrated in its cities. Moscow, St. Petersburg, Nizhney Novgorod, Voronezh... outside of the cities, in the oblasts live barefoot, TB infected, vodka soaked, toothless cretins.

They would be the survivors.