Under 300k is normal churn, right?
Depends.
Under Bush, anything over 200K was "horrific, and the worst expected".
Then, under BO, that number went to 250, then 300, then 350, then 375. Looks like it might be back to 300, now.
Like a previous poster said...."We have always been at war with Oceania".
Actually if you look at the chart I just posted, when you get to below 300K it might been seen as a “peak” for a good labor market and is normally followed by a recession.
Yes, if you had the same total employment numbers that we had before this bunch of bozos took over...................