The IT is the main pro-EU paper. Originally it was known as the “Protestant paper”.
Of course they’d attack Google for looking at the EU ruling and seeing what it allows and doesn’t allow.
The way the ruling stands right now, it's as if O.J. Simpson could petition to have every reference to his ordeals since the murder of his ex-wife stricken from memory, and every digital journal accessible to the EU via Internet would be bound to comply.
Meanwhile, 'privacy advocates' in the EU celebrate the ruling as being able to 'un-Tweet' anything offensive they may have said in youthful indiscretion.
That's my own interpretation. Maybe I'm off-base.