Posted on 07/27/2014 1:50:18 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
Thomas Scott-Chambers, 28, is head of dangerous new pro-Russia group Za Rossiu, meaning For Russia, which backs President Vladimir Putin’s incursions on Ukraine. ....
The Sunday Mirror filmed the ranting Russian-speaking leader defending the shooting down of Malaysia Airlines flight MH17 this month, at the cost of 298 lives, which has been blamed on pro-Russian separatists in Ukraine.
But Scott-Chambers, wearing a black and orange ribbon on his suit lapel in support of the rebels, blamed the Ukraine military for the strike.
He said: “Malaysia Airlines should have known better to send a plane over a war zone. Who in World War Two sent planes to fly over Europe?
“Ukraine closed their air space and when you close your air space, you shoot anything unidentified down. What happens every day is Ukrainians shoot into Russia, and then the Russians retaliate and it’s all over the news.”
He then launched into a vile homophobic rant, raging: “I’m completely against homosexuality. I think it’s disgusting. I think it’s a perversion of all human morals.
"Russia is the only country standing up against the seemingly-global trend.”
Blaming homosexuality for recent paedophile scandals, he said: “If you see where homosexual propaganda has led us and look at the scandals recently with paedophiles, even in Parliament, it’s all because of this ‘do what you like’ culture.”
Continuing his fascist outpouring....he said: “The only reason they’re making a fuss about Israel is because Obama has told the Jews to start bombing the Arabs again.
"A couple of Arabs die in Gaza every day, don’t worry about it. The Zionist lobby is huge.
“The worst thing to be in Great Britain is a white, working class male. If you’re a black, a homosexual or a Jew you get a council house tomorrow.”
(Excerpt) Read more at mirror.co.uk ...
Sarah Palin Launches Online TV Channel - July 27, 2014 - In a "Sarah Says" video that is featured on the site, Palin says the tragic downing of the Malaysian Airlines plane has "shifted the balance of world opinion against Vladimir Putin" since "there is a lot of evidence pointing to pro-Russian separatists" as being responsible for the "thoughtless massacre."
So you used to be an operator, but no longer because you have put on so much weight?
I associate “operator” with Special Operations troops, really, Delta.
It looks like you are leaving the “operator” implied on this thread, stand, that could lead to people thinking you were in a Special Operations unit or even Delta.
I hate to ask this, but are you mentally challenged? Or just an obtuse ****head? Or both?
Why ignore post 122?
Post 107 asked you if you were still an “operator”.
Now looking at it, I guess he meant you were operating a telephone in an office rather than being in a Special Operations unit.
I’ve never been in special forces, just like I told you on that other thread an hour or two ago. Now leave me alone and go bother someone else, troll. People like you are the reason I’m contemplating doing something else other than posting here. If I want anything more from you I’ll fart in your direction.
I would like to go there sometime as well.
Hopefully before 3rd world immigrants ruin their country.
You sure do personalize everything and do a lot of nasty, hostile lashing out for no reason, for instance the way you have posted to me and others on this thread.
I just wanted some clarification of the word “operator”, sometimes your descriptions of what seem to be a pretty normal time in the military, seem to get a little exuberant, for instance while the rest of us Cold War vets served under Reagan, or Nixon, or Carter, you seemed to be the one that President Reagan should have been describing you in his memoirs as the indispensable one, as you post things comparing yourself to others such as, “”Please regale us with your contributions to President Reagan’s legacy””,for you it isn’t merely serving under Reagan as a GI, it is portraying yourself as an irreplaceable part of the Reagan administration.
It’s funny how many people have to defend their military service or lack of it, to Reagan’s hero and indispensable man.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
My but you ARE taking it personal.
I was an AF officer, flying F4s, in the 70th TFS.
K?
98 posted on 7/27/2014 6:00:27 PM by Kozak
Gee you served in the military as did I and millions of us, man you are flamboyant.
You served under Jimmy Carter and Reagan, and I served under Nixon and Reagan, but you are the only person at FR that I know of, that pretends to have been Reagan’s indispensable person responsible for his NATO success.
I was an intelligence analyst that helped with briefings for both of those presidents. I never claimed to be a general or secretary of defense. I also worked for Generals Ross and Haig, ever heard of them? Nixon and Reagan? How did you skip Ford and Carter?
So you briefed President Carter and President Reagan or were in the room helping the briefer, while they were there, so?
And why is it surprising that someone who left the Army during Nixon’s term, might want to serve a hitch in the military under Reagan?
NCOs and enlisted don’t brief the president, which makes sense when you think about it, right?
You implied you were in the room during these briefings, and I mentioned that, your flamboyant way of describing your personal individual importance to the Presidents, NATO and the Cold War and “President Reagan’s legacy”, does cause some confusion.
Maybe that’s because you’re retarded. Everyone else here knows what I’m saying. What were you, a laundry and bath specialist or one of McNamara’s 100,000? LOL
At least you are staying in character, mocking and belittling other’s military service.
LMA.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.