Posted on 07/28/2014 3:06:40 PM PDT by ifinnegan
It’s interesting how you change the subject.
Are you pro-life?
Do you believe in God?
So Washington should not have evacuated Manhatten? He should never have given the Red Coats command of New York?
Sometimes you surrender ground in order to fight from a better position.
If McConnell wins, nothing changes.
If McConnell loses, then the Tea Party adherents scare the crap out of the Republicans.
The Republicans, some of them at least, will realize that they cannot betray conservatives over and over and over again and still expect them to vote because “the other guy is worse”.
You are so used to being slapped around and misused that you don’t even realize you are a battered wife.
It's the same subject, and you are deliberately avoiding it. Mitch McConnell voting to confirm Obama's Judicial appointees is furthering the cause of Abortion on demand.
You may not like it, but your buddy Mitch is at least as bad as the enemy, and because he deliberately turned his fire on his own base, in my opinion he is worse.
Mitch McConnel shot us. It is not about pride, it is about the fact he attempted to kill us and will try to do so again if he retains power.
And as far as I know, everybody on this site is Pro-Life and Believes in God, Myself included.
Typical that you go for the emotional imagery.
Battered wife. It’s imagery and argument that also appeals to ego and pride.
Your pride is hurt because you were beat by Mitch McConnell.
Therefore to he’ll with everyone else?
Your selfishness knows no bounds.
Grimes is not good no matter how you argue for her.
I ask about your personal convictions because it is important in seeing where you come from.
I get a strong amount of antiChristian scent from those who see the RINO as worse than the worst of the Molech worshipping Dems.
You are not a Christian, are you?
Which of these two expressed a wish to punch TEA partiers in the face?
1. Alison L. Grimes
2. Mitch McConnell
Thanks for stating you are pro-life and believe in God.
I assume that means Christian.
My question is why do you support Grimes who is a Molech worshipper.
Don’t say Mitch is just as bad.
I would have to question your intelligence and discernment if you truly believed that.
“Which of these two expressed a wish to punch TEA partiers in the face?
1. Alison L. Grimes
2. Mitch McConnell”
McConnell.
Are you seriously trying to say that therefore Grimes is more in line with Tea Party ideals?
Your post perfectly proves the point that this is about pride, pettiness and vindictiveness, not about what is best for the USA.
Don’t put words in my writing.
I’m making the point McConnell is a compromised douchebag who has a mountain to climb before he ever wins back the trust and support of conservatives.
“The Cantor’s need to die off”
Yes. And Conservatives have to take their place
This thread Is is about people here who want to replace the Cantors and McConnell’s with Boxers and Feinsteins
I doubt you support that?
You are a piece of work. All your arguments throughout this and the other thread have been nothing but emotional imagery.
"We have to vote for McConnell because ABORTION!!!!! Do you support ABORTION!!!!? "
Give me a break.
It is depressing that there are actually FReepers who would disagree with what you said.
I cry for my country.
Is the sin of pride clouding their judgement in wanting the pro-Abortion leftist to be a Senator from KY?
what does Pride have to do with punishing an incompetent Republican who surrendered to the Democrats??
A GOP led senate would do nothing to stop the Obama regime.
Now is a great time to clean out the incompetent Republicans.
“I’m making the point McConnell is a compromised douchebag who has a mountain to climb before he ever wins back the trust and support of conservatives.”
I agree.
That goes for his ChiCom wife too.
But you support even worse in Grimes and I cannot understand or accept it.
I believe it is a spiritual issue in that you cannot see the harm of supporting Grimes and that Grimes in office is infinitely worse than McConnell being a douche.
The words you choose reflect your spiritual state.
What nonsense.
My pride wasn’t hurt, conservatives were betrayed. Why do you defend the traitors?
I am a born-again, spirit filled Christian. Baptized in the Holy Spirit, student of the Bible, and not someone held under the sway of “well, at least he isn’t as bad as the other one.”
Grimes is awful. But we all recognize that. We know that we will fight her.
McConnell is worse. He is a traitor. We don’t know what, if any, of his promises he will keep. We cannot trust him!
In Dante’s Inferno, the lowest layers of Hell was reserved for traitors. Murderers were above them.
And by the way, if you are going to accuse me of using an ad hominem attack for my comparing your behavior and attitude to that of a battered wife, then you might do well not to question my salvation and dedication to the cause of Christ just 6 lines later.
Your emotional attachment to keeping a traitor and abuser in power is palpable. You don’t care about those he betrayed, including the unborn. You don’t care that he will be left in a position to betray again.
“Why do you defend the traitors?”
Let’s address this.
Where did I ever defend McConnell?
Let me put this in words you can understand. Mitch is Judas, and Grimes is a Roman Soldier.
Actually, Ronald McDonald can replace them for all I care, since the ONLY RECOURSE you have is EITHER the primary (fixed, generally, by the GOP (See MS)), or the general.
You can’t screw us on Monday and count on us on Tuesday, can you?
Nobody yet has made a coherent argument to me that replacing fake conservatives with actual liberals is worse than reelecting the fake conservatives and rewarding what amounts to fraud and grand larceny.
You could give it a go if you like.
This is where we disagreed in the other thread.
When you speak of "Boxers and Feinsteins," you are speaking of solid liberals in a solidly blue liberal state.
I asked you if you thought that a liberal like Grimes can get away with six years of supporting Harry Reid in a red state like Kentucky and still expect the power of incumbency to protect her seat?
I asked if Scott Brown in Massachusetts was a better example?
You said that yes, you did expect Grimes to align with the Democrat agenda and still be sent back by Kentucky in six years.
I don't think that you can make that assumption. I think that Kentucky will oust the Democrat in six years and give the seat back to a Republican.
Unless, that is, the country as we know it ceases to exist before the 2020 elections, but I'm not going to put that outcome on a Grimes win.
-PJ
“I am a born-again, spirit filled Christian. Baptized in the Holy Spirit, student of the Bible, and not someone held under the sway of “well, at least he isn’t as bad as the other one.”
Grimes is awful. But we all recognize that. We know that we will fight her.”
How is putting her in office fighting her?
I think you need to pray on this brother.
You can’t support Molech over a Brother who has stumbled.
You cannot support Molech because we have been betrayed.
It’s not about McConnell. He is nothing and it is not about keeping him in office.
It is about not increasing the power of Molech.
I find your hatred of McConnell to the detriment of your clear thinking a problem you need to address.
There is an easy solution as well.
Get him elected, so Grimes loses, then recall him.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.