As you prepare to figure out whether or not you’re on the terror watch list, it’s important to remember just what this report is and is not. While the name “Homeland Security” is all over it, the report does not come from DHS. It was prepared by a group of university professors and was submitted to Homeland Security for consideration.
Thank you. I didn’t catch that.
(Study prepared by) “a group of university analysts”
If they are Bill Ayers-type academics, I would be unhappy if I were not on the list.
Oui, I break wind in their general direction. They are wipers of animal food troughs and they may boil their bottoms, I care not.
Yep. More university professors who live in an alternate universe making decisions for society.
http://www.amazon.com/Intellectuals-Society-Thomas-Sowell/dp/B004H8GL40
“As you prepare to figure out whether or not you’re on the terror watch list, it’s important to remember just what this report is and is not. While the name “Homeland Security” is all over it, the report does not come from DHS. It was prepared by a group of university professors and was submitted to Homeland Security for consideration. “
Trust me, they want to reach this conclusion. Obama and crowd are itching to make opposition illegal, or the next best thing to illegal.
Historically, the threat of any of these groups is low to nonexistent. But they are treating such people like they are Hamas against Israel.
Why? They know they are intent on taking this country in a direction destined to make such people a true enemy to their RULERS. Libs know that threat is coming, from their own extra-constitutional actions.
Does the SPLC have a hand in this deciding which Americans are threats and which are not? Apparently conservatives are always considered a threat in their biased (just as does IRS) outlook. Do the citizens get a say in this or do only the public servants?