Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TauntedTiger

LOL, I don’t know what exactly what you infer with your “feel good” remark. I suspect it was not warm and fuzzy.

That said, we are just going to have to disagree. If I had my way, I would not require a license for anybody to buy or carry a gun.

However, IF THEY WANT TO CARRY, I would require them to have a few hours training and pass a test............sort of like doctors have to do, real estate agents, drivers, pilots, hair stylists, CPA’s, lawyers and on and on endlessly.

Like you, I am concerned that the libs would worm their way into the legislating process and make the test 5,000 questions long! That’s truly a risk and we are in agreement on that. In fact, upon reflection, I guess I should say that my support of “training and testing” would be conditional upon such “training and testing” be reasonable. If that cannot be, then I would not support it.


16 posted on 08/04/2014 9:01:56 PM PDT by Cen-Tejas (it's the debt bomb stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: Cen-Tejas

Confusing reply.

In any case, we both can envision liberals sabotaging the testing process with burden and expense. IMHO, CCW permits should be for felons only.


17 posted on 08/05/2014 1:18:30 AM PDT by TauntedTiger (On the outside looking in!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson