Agree, and if it were unconstitutional then so should marrying anything or marrying as many people as one wants.
Now has our side even bothered to argue that to these activist judges the homosexuals seek when they go judge shopping?
I have yet not got an answer to where in the Federal constitution is states you have a constitutional right to marry anyway, and yet in our state the Fl constitution does mention exactly what marriage is.
The faggots may be celebrating prematurely, because this WILL get straightened out.
Maybe the Florida idiot didn't read this opinion by the DC SCOTUS idiot Kennedy.
DOMA's unusual deviation from the usual tradition of recognizing and accepting state definitions of marriage here operates to deprive same-sex couples of the benefits and responsibilities that come with the federal recognition of their marriages.
This is strong evidence of a law having the purpose and effect of disapproval of that class.
The avowed purpose and practical effect of the law here in question are to impose a disadvantage, a separate status and so a stigma upon all who enter into same-sex marriages made lawful by the unquestioned authority of the States."
Judge Cohen is a no talent hack.