Skip to comments.
Pioneer CEO: US oil production could hit 14 million barrels/day
fuelfix ^
| August 6, 2014 at 6:54 pm
| y Jennifer A. Dlouhy
Posted on 08/07/2014 3:32:58 PM PDT by ckilmer
Posted on August 6, 2014 at 6:54 pm by Jennifer A. Dlouhy in
General
Scott Sheffield, chairman and CEO of Pioneer Natural Resources, speaks in Midland, Texas. (Tim Fischer\Reporter-Telegram)
DENVER — Technological improvements will allow energy companies to scrape more crude out of the ground and drive U.S. oil production higher, even as producers seek new overseas markets for the fossil fuels, executives said Wednesday.
Although government forecasters expect U.S. oil production to peak around 9.5 million barrels per day in 2016, Scott Sheffield, CEO of Irving, Texas-based Pioneer Natural Resources told an energy conference here the real pinnacle could be 14 million barrels daily.
“The only thing that can stop it is oil prices,” Sheffield said, warning that a price collapse for domestic West Texas Intermediate crude would cause “a tremendous turndown.”
Steven Mueller, CEO of Houston-based Southwestern Energy, a major gas producer, sees big potential as companies apply unconventional techniques to conventional basins and areas once written off as unworkable.
Mueller predicted that energy companies will return to some of those plays with “crummy rock” — a category he said included “all of Midland and West Texas” — and figure out how to make them economic. Mueller added that every conventional basin also has source rock that can be exploited through hydraulic fracturing, a post-drilling completion method that involves pumping sand, water and chemicals underground to pull oil and gas from rock pores.
“There are basins in the world that have never been produced that will produce,” he said.
The industry may not discover any more big elephant fields boasting 25 to 75 billions of barrels of oil, Sheffield said, but operators will continue to find new opportunities in conventional plays. And he noted the industry is pursuing new techniques for boosting the recovery rate at wells up from the 2 to 3 percent common today.
Read more: Enhanced oil recovery techniques limited in shale
Mueller said it is a long-term project that could yield big gains decades from now.
“This is an area ripe for some huge increases,” Mueller said. “We’re going to learn fairly quickly…but this is a long-term thing we are working on. Two to three generations from now our grandchildren and their children will solve this problem.”
Boosting production is only one objective; many domestic producers also are looking to supply markets outside the U.S.
Pioneer won a coveted ruling from Commerce Department regulators in March confirming that the company could export an ultra-light hydrocarbon known as condensate coming out of Eagle Ford wells as long as it is first stabilized and processed in a distillation tower. Once processed through those facilities — which Sheffield said cost about $6.5 to $10 million apiece — the government considers the condensate to be a petroleum product, therefore unlimited by the 39-year-old ban on exporting raw crude.
“You can look at it as a minimum refinery,” Sheffield said, noting that Pioneer’s distillation process allows the company to pull off liquid petroleum gas. “We actually change the form of our condensate fairly significantly by running it through.”
The first cargo of that processed condensate just shipped from Galveston, Texas, and Pioneer said in an earnings call Tuesday that the company expects monthly cargoes through the end of the year.
“The benefit of that is that we’re getting significantly higher pricing as compared to refiners who are discounting any condensate…somewhere between $10 and $15 off WTI,” Sheffield said. “We’re taking the extra cash flow and reinvesting it back in the ground and drilling more wells.”
Read more: One condensate cargo sails away, but others could take time
Other companies who hope to follow suit have asked the Commerce Department for similar rulings — but many view condensate export as just a move toward their ultimate goal: a complete lifting of the 1970s-era ban on selling most U.S. crude overseas.
Sheffield predicted an ongoing education campaign aimed at the Obama administration and lawmakers on Capitol Hill would yield a reversal, possibly by 2017.
Federal law already allows natural gas exports, but only one company holds every permit needed to export a liquefied form of the fuel: Houston-based Cheniere Energy Inc., which is building a facility in Sabine Pass, La. Two other proposed LNG export projects are right behind Cheniere, with conditional export licenses and Federal Energy Regulatory Commission approval of their construction plans:
Freeport LNG at Quintana Island, Texas, and Sempra LNG’s proposed project in Hackberry, La.
Partners in that $10 billion Louisiana project, known as Cameron LNG, approved a final investment decision Wednesday.
Another approval: Oregon LNG wins natural gas export license
Some gas export advocates say the regulatory process in Washington is moving too slowly, potentially jeopardizing U.S. companies’ chance to sell into Asian markets. But Southwestern’s Mueller said the process of building those multi-billion dollar export facilities and exporting LNG “will go slower than everybody thinks” even without regulatory delays.
But, he suggested, the real upside of U.S. gas production isn’t exports; it’s the potential to use the fossil fuel domestically both as a chemical feedstock that can be transformed into other products and an electricity source keeping refineries and factories humming.
“You’re seeing the world come to our doorstep because we’ve got cheap energy,” Mueller said.
TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: energy; fracking; oil; permian
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
1
posted on
08/07/2014 3:32:58 PM PDT
by
ckilmer
To: ckilmer
2
posted on
08/07/2014 3:42:54 PM PDT
by
Repeal The 17th
(We have met the enemy and he is us.)
To: thackney; bestintxas; Kennard; nuke rocketeer; crusty old prospector; Smokin' Joe
Pioneer CEO: US oil production could hit 14 million barrels/day
................
This is what I’ve been saying for about the last year or so.
Pioneer’s caveat is that in order for that to happen—prices have to stay high.
I think US refiners are currently lobbying to prevent rules changes in overseas shipments of crude while US oil producers are lobbying to allow more overseas shipments of crude.
...hmmm I would rather production went up than prices went down. Unless US refiners can refine all that oil and ship it abroad as finished product—then it will become necessary to ship unfinished crude overseas for refining.
hard to know how this actually plays out.
ISIS just took the primary reservoir for water in Iraq. Shia soldiers don’t fight as well as the sunnis nor does it appear as though their commanders are as good.
3
posted on
08/07/2014 3:46:02 PM PDT
by
ckilmer
(q)
To: Repeal The 17th
4
posted on
08/07/2014 3:46:21 PM PDT
by
nascarnation
(Toxic Baraq Syndrome: hopefully infecting a Dem candidate near you)
To: ckilmer
While there is a lot of pessimism these days about the US, this is a positive development.
The other fun thing is that China is replacing us as OPEC’s big hog at the oil trough. The ragheads are going to learn over the next 10 years what it’s like to have a much more “assertive” customer. One with 1.3 billion (mostly expendable) people.
5
posted on
08/07/2014 3:49:29 PM PDT
by
nascarnation
(Toxic Baraq Syndrome: hopefully infecting a Dem candidate near you)
To: ckilmer
Can you imagine how terrible our economy would be today if it were not for these new oil technologies? If oil were $150/bl or higher and gas at the pumps were $5/gal thanks to Mr. Oil-Hater and his clean green cohorts in Washington running things, our inflation would be terrible and our economy in chaos with these clueless assclowns causing further panic.
6
posted on
08/07/2014 3:55:03 PM PDT
by
OrangeHoof
(Every time you say no to a liberal, you make the Baby Barack cry.)
To: Repeal The 17th
What is it today?
...........
Currently US oil production is about 8.5 million barrels @day. Production this year and next is expected to go up 1 million barrels each year. The US Energy Information Agency (EIA) says currently that US oil production will peak out about 9.4 million Barrels@ day in 2015. However, energy estimates from the permian, eagle ford, bakken, gulf of mexico and an assortment of smaller plays already show that oil output in 2016-2020 will still increase by at least another 500k barrels@ day.
The significance of Pioneer’s CEO statement is that Pioneer is the biggest most successful driller in the Permian basin which is several orders of magnitude bigger than the bakken and eagle ford combined. Production in the eagle ford and bakken has been optimized. Production in permian basin is a long long way from being optimized. We have not really seen the kind of comparable production growth phase in the Permian basin that we have seen in the bakken and eagle ford and elsewhere.
When that growth phase hits the permian basin it should leave people pretty gobsmacked.
There will be a pretty big WOW factor.
However, the kind of production increases that the Permian basin can produce will also cause considerable downward pressure on the price of oil.... unless considerable and increasing worldwide demand can soak up the extra supply while falling supply elsewhere gives room for extra US oil.
Hard to say how things will shake out.
7
posted on
08/07/2014 4:02:49 PM PDT
by
ckilmer
(q)
To: OrangeHoof
Can you imagine how terrible our economy would be today if it were not for these new oil technologies? If oil were $150/bl or higher and gas at the pumps were $5/gal thanks to Mr. Oil-Hater and his clean green cohorts in Washington running things, our inflation would be terrible and our economy in chaos with these clueless assclowns causing further panic.
..................
I totally agree. What’s grievous is that the dems will claim credit for achievements of the oil patch when they had nothing to do with it—and in fact— where ever possible—sought to kill it.
Same thing happened in the 1990’s. Clinton fought newt tooth and nail to raise government spending. All newt did was to halt the rise in government spending while rising revenues from the dot com revolution balanced the federal books. Clinton creamed newt for his efforts and then took credit for the balanced budget that he had nothing to do with. A balanced budget is now Clinton’s legacy.
Same thing is happening with Obama.
8
posted on
08/07/2014 4:08:42 PM PDT
by
ckilmer
(q)
To: nascarnation
The other fun thing is that China is replacing us as OPECs big hog at the oil trough.
................
China is the principle country the USA is running a trade imbalance with today.
Even when the USA become oil independent, the USA will still have a large trade imbalance—principally with China.
But maybe that will change too given advances in 3d printing, advanced robotics, and many other things. Last year for the first time there was no new net outflow of manufacturing jobs because companies have started to bring production back to the USA.
Hard to say how things will shake out.
9
posted on
08/07/2014 4:12:44 PM PDT
by
ckilmer
(q)
To: ckilmer
And I’m still paying almost $4 a gallon at the pump...
10
posted on
08/07/2014 4:24:10 PM PDT
by
Sparticus
(Tar and feathers for the next dumb@ss Republican that uses the word bipartisanship.)
To: ckilmer
the Permian basin which is several orders of magnitude bigger than the bakken and eagle ford combined Can you explain what you are comparing?
11
posted on
08/08/2014 4:31:28 AM PDT
by
thackney
(life is fragile, handle with prayer.)
To: ckilmer
“Production in the eagle ford and bakken has been optimized.
What do you mean when you say this?
12
posted on
08/08/2014 4:46:51 AM PDT
by
bestintxas
(Every time a RINO bites the dust a founding father gets his wings)
To: OrangeHoof
You are spot on.
It has happened in spite of Obama
13
posted on
08/08/2014 4:51:06 AM PDT
by
bert
((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc.;+12 ..... Obama is public enemy #1)
To: bestintxas
Production in the eagle ford and bakken has been optimized.
What do you mean when you say this?
............
Well you’re right. “Optimized” is a poor term. The corporate word is “derisked.” I think derisked my be comperable to production as in exploration phase followed by production phase.
And yes “optimized” is always relative. There’s always new techniques that come on that enable drillers to extract more oil.
14
posted on
08/08/2014 6:50:15 AM PDT
by
ckilmer
(q)
To: thackney
the Permian basin which is several orders of magnitude bigger than the bakken and eagle ford combined
Can you explain what you are comparing?
..............
If your point is that I “several orders of magnitude” is an exaggeration... then yeah that’s probably saying too much.
15
posted on
08/08/2014 6:55:20 AM PDT
by
ckilmer
(q)
To: ckilmer
If your point is that I several orders of magnitude is an exaggeration... then yeah thats probably saying too much. Yeah, I cannot think of any measurement you could make that would be at least a 1000 times greater, or even a single order of magnitude.
16
posted on
08/08/2014 7:14:30 AM PDT
by
thackney
(life is fragile, handle with prayer.)
To: ckilmer
And yes optimized is always relative. Yes, since the Bakken and the Eagle Ford are both growing production faster on a per rig comparison, it would be difficult to described them as optimized and the Permian is not.
17
posted on
08/08/2014 7:16:06 AM PDT
by
thackney
(life is fragile, handle with prayer.)
To: thackney
Yes, since the Bakken and the Eagle Ford are both growing production faster on a per rig comparison, it would be difficult to described them as optimized and the Permian is not.
..............
But if the CEO of Pioneer is to be believed then we should be seeing much higher production coming out of the permian in the coming years.
18
posted on
08/08/2014 7:53:19 AM PDT
by
ckilmer
(q)
To: ckilmer
I don’t see how that makes the claim Bakken and Eagle Ford are “optimized”. Their production rate per drilling rig continues to climb at a faster rate than the Permian.
I am not saying the Permian is not going to increase. I am confident it will increase per drill rig and in total. I just see the same continuing in the other two as well for now.
19
posted on
08/08/2014 8:24:15 AM PDT
by
thackney
(life is fragile, handle with prayer.)
To: ckilmer
Mueller said it is a long-term project that could yield big gains
decades from now.
This is an area ripe for some huge increases, Mueller said. Were going to learn fairly quickly
but this is a long-term thing we are working on. Two to three generations from now our grandchildren and their children will solve this problem.
20
posted on
08/08/2014 8:26:53 AM PDT
by
thackney
(life is fragile, handle with prayer.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson