STILL have yet to see any evidence produced and that is frustrating. Allegations are not evidence. Evidence and facts, that’s the only thing that matters. Where are they? Ugh.
Did you read the whole article? It appears that their own numbers are the evidence. The totals don’t match. Even if you assume that the absentee votes are included in the total, they are still off by 500+ votes. If the absentee votes are not included in the official total, they are off by 1000 votes.
>>STILL have yet to see any evidence produced and that is frustrating. Allegations are not evidence. Evidence and facts, that’s the only thing that matters. Where are they? <<
I don’t have the link, but the affidavits filed by McDaniel’s campaign workers can be viewed online. In them you’ll find evidence that a lot of people who were ineligible to vote in the runoff did, in fact, vote.
There’s even a weird pattern across several counties where some of the evidence of Dem June 3rd voting was “struck through” and that’s where the real insider fraud investigation should probably start, because someone must have given county personnel instructions to line out the June 3rd Dem “voted” notations in bulk. The people who actually drew the strike-throughs aren’t going to be willing to go to jail for doing it, so they’d fold at the first hint that they could do some time.
That said, the number of people who voted in both primaries plus the number of strike-throughs doesn’t seem to be enough to overturn the result, but the affidavits only cover about half the counties. As the story indicated, the LaFayette Co lawyer wouldn’t let them examine the poll books, so there’s probably a motherlode of fraudulent votes/strike-throughs there. But again, it’s not likely to be enough.
There’s evidence available online, but I’m not sure there’s going to be enough of it in the end.