[sevinufnine]

But didn’t Obama say George Bush should not have gone into Iraq? Why is it OK for him? There were Americans living there after 9/11, right? And Saddam was killing innocent people. What’s the difference?

[kjam22]

There were Americans living there after 9/11, right? And Saddam was killing innocent people. What’s the difference?

Its less than 100 days before mid-term elections. He is poling under 40%. He is about to lose the Senate. Putin and Russia has been challenging his "manhood" .... Everyone knows he's a really bad gay golfer married to a tranny. His liberal bosses know they are about to have to move back to Berkley.... any number of reasons.

[SecondAmendment]

> But didn’t Obama say George Bush should not have gone into Iraq?
> Why is it OK for him?

Easy, GWB had an (R) after his name instead of a (D).

[what's up]

Hillary invaded Libya for so called humanitarian reasons.

But George Bush is some kind of monster for toppling Saddam for the same reason?

Weird logic.

[MichaelCorleone]

You ask “Why is it OK for him (obama)? Anything and everything that is detrimental to America is fine for obama and his lackeys to do.

And that's what we're looking at for the remaining 2 or so years, and longer if the like-minded people in the alphabet agencies are not weeded out.

[Frank_2001]

“Why is it OK for him?”
Because bombs dropped by Democrats are GOOD bombs, released with only the purest and noblest intentions, not to make money for Exxon and Halliburton like those wicked Republican war criminals!!! /SARCASM