Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Eva
there are lot of those on the internet who are attempting to refute recent studies on the negative impacts of marijuana by siting studies done in 1971.

The age of a study in and of itself tells us nothing about the validity of its conclusions. Only if a newer study uses a larger dataset, or explicitly addresses deficiencies in an older study's methodology, can it be presumed superior to the older study.

239 posted on 08/14/2014 6:37:53 AM PDT by ConservingFreedom (A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies ]


To: ConservingFreedom

First of all, the marijuana of today contains more TCH than the old marijuana and the studies that are being done today use diagnostic techniques that were not available in the early seventies.

New studies show that there is real observable physical damage to the brain of marijuana users. Marijuana is stored in the fatty tissue of the body, the brain is the largest depository. The damage can be seen on an MRI.

Other studies show that ingested marijuana is more powerful than smoked marijuana. There have been two deaths in Colorado that have been attributed to marijuana laced food, one a cookie, the other, candy.


259 posted on 08/14/2014 10:46:12 AM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson