Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Straight Vermonter

I think the cop is digging a deep hole to get out of by not making his version of events public.


64 posted on 08/15/2014 4:38:14 PM PDT by xzins ( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]


To: xzins
I think the cop is digging a deep hole to get out of by not making his version of events public.

I sincerely doubt that it is his choice to make. It is an ongoing investigation, and while he almost certainly would be anxious to clear his name, there are rules and procedures. Added to that the fact that certain "witnesses" are spinning tales that are simply not credible, at least not to rational people, (trying to pull a 300 pound person through a side window, Gentle Giant on his knees begging for his life, etc.), the police are undoubtedly getting all their ducks in a row before anything significant is released about what happened.

But, fortunately, the non-nonsensical narrative that started this is unraveling at a speed even greater than the Tale of Saint Skittles.
66 posted on 08/15/2014 4:44:21 PM PDT by jjsheridan5 (Remember Mississippi -- leave the GOP plantation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

In these types of situations the only one who does NOT get to talk is the officer. The only people this cop is talking to is the LEOs that are investigating.

There are protocols that police departments follow in these cases. This is not unusual but most likely very standard procedure in most LE agencies.


74 posted on 08/15/2014 5:06:12 PM PDT by conservativegranny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

To: xzins
"I think the cop is digging a deep hole to get out of by not making his version of events public."

If he talks against the advice of legal counsel, he would be digging a hole. In many departments, the officer will have a legal representative show up at the scene. One of the things the rep may do is to advise the officer not to make a public statement. Plus, the lawyers defending the Ferguson police in the lawsuits will also tell him not to make public statements.

78 posted on 08/15/2014 5:14:59 PM PDT by Respond Code Three (Support Free Republic lest we eventually get a Republic which is not free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

To: xzins
I think the cop is digging a deep hole to get out of by not making his version of events public.

I think he has an audience that does not care about his version of events. Unless he says that he shot him in cold blood, that is. They aren't interested in hearing any other story.

Were I him, i'd be saving it for the jury, and I would be demanding a change of venue as well. Of course, with the media deliberately polluting the jury pool, it gets harder and harder to find a non tainted jury.

109 posted on 08/16/2014 11:48:11 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson