Do you have a link for that???
LOL! Oh, my. You are a piece of work, aren't you?
Why would I 'have a link for that' since my statement was: could have conceivably..... as in a possibility.
I know, it's one of those confusing words for you, like when you're all in a tizzy about how the Chief said the officer didn't have the description in the INITIAL contact, you just can't seem to grasp the fact there was also a secondary contact that night, just seconds from the first.
----
BTW - Did you think you demand for proof would obscure the fact that you're ignoring that your own time-line doesn't ad up?
HOW could the officer have heard the initial broadcast if he was still on the scene of his last call? They DO turn their radios down when they're talking to someone on a scene.
Not surprising, though. Not the first time I've seen you go off on a tangent to try to avoid the facts that won't fit your narrative that some innocent party was killed.
----
You are the one who has continually asserted the officer heard the broadcast the first time at the second it was broadcast, so why don't YOU provide us with YOUR link to prove it.....unless this is just yet another round of your 'pin-the-guilt-on-the-copper' game.