I won't expect someone not even conversant with the basic facts to actually read the statute. You thought, just for example, that the prosecutor was a Republican. You also don't have the slightest idea how the statute defines coercion, despite there being numerous links in this thread.
I was under the impression all the Bush family operatives quit this place long ago, so I have to assume that your use of the the leftwing dog whistle "echo chamber" identifies you as a libtard. Good luck trying to use facts and logic, when you actually attempt them for the first time.
“I was under the impression all the Bush family operatives quit this place long ago, so I have to assume that your use of the the leftwing dog whistle “echo chamber” identifies you as a libtard. Good luck trying to use facts and logic, when you actually attempt them for the first time.”
Make all the assumptions you want.
Unless you’re a legal professional all your cutting and pasting doesn’t really mean anything. A Special prosecutor asked for and got an indictment.
Sorry if I put your knickers in a bunch.
The fact that a lot of people here agree that there’s nothing here, doesn’t make it so. That’s behind the echo chamber comment.
I remember back in Oct 2012. The echo chamber insisted all the polls were wrong and slanted and Obama was going to go down.
Funny how the polls pretty much matched the outcome.
Perry has been indicted.
We’ll see what happens next